• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结肠癌——中等规模中心肿瘤切除质量评估

Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colon cancer-quality of oncologic resection evaluation in a medium volume center.

作者信息

Enciu Octavian, Avino Adelaida, Calu Valentin, Toma Elena Adelina, Tulin Adrian, Tulin Raluca, Slavu Iulian, Răducu Laura, Balcangiu-Stroescu Andra-Elena, Gheoca Mutu Daniela-Elena, Tomescu Luminiţa Florentina, Miron Adrian

机构信息

Discipline of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020021, Romania.

Department of General Surgery, Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest 11468, Romania.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2022 May 20;24(1):455. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11382. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2022.11382
PMID:35747155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204561/
Abstract

Despite concerns regarding oncologic safety, laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been proven in several trials in the lasts decades to be superior to open surgery. In addition, the benefits of laparoscopic surgery can be offered to other patients with malignant disease. The aim of the present study was to compare the quality of oncologic resection for non-metastatic, resectable colon cancer between laparoscopic and open surgery in terms of specimen margins and retrieved lymph nodes in a medium volume center in Romania. A total of 219 patients underwent surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer between January 2017 and December 2020. Of these, 52 underwent laparoscopic resection, while 167 had open surgery. None of the patients in the laparoscopic group had positive circumferential margins (P=0.035) while 12 (7.19%) patients in the open group (OG) had positive margins. A total of three patients in the laparoscopic group (5.77%) and seven patients (4.19%) in the OG had invaded axial margins. While the number of retrieved lymph nodes was not correlated with the type of procedure [laparoscopic group 16.12 (14±6.56), OG 17.31 (15±8.42), P=0.448], the lymph node ratio was significantly higher in the OG (P=0.003). Given the results of the present study, it is safe to conclude that laparoscopic surgery is not inferior to open surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer in a medium volume center.

摘要

尽管存在对肿瘤学安全性的担忧,但在过去几十年的多项试验中已证明,结肠癌的腹腔镜手术优于开放手术。此外,腹腔镜手术的益处也可惠及其他恶性疾病患者。本研究的目的是在罗马尼亚的一个中等规模中心,就标本切缘和获取的淋巴结情况,比较腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗非转移性、可切除结肠癌的肿瘤切除质量。2017年1月至2020年12月期间,共有219例患者接受了非转移性结肠癌手术。其中,52例行腹腔镜切除术,167例行开放手术。腹腔镜组患者均无环周切缘阳性(P=0.035),而开放组有12例(7.19%)患者切缘阳性。腹腔镜组共有3例患者(5.77%)和开放组7例患者(4.19%)有轴向切缘受侵。虽然获取的淋巴结数量与手术方式无关[腹腔镜组16.12(14±6.56),开放组17.31(15±8.42),P=0.448],但开放组的淋巴结比率显著更高(P=0.003)。根据本研究结果,可以有把握地得出结论,在中等规模中心,腹腔镜手术治疗非转移性结肠癌并不逊色于开放手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/0c6d62b8a9a8/etm-24-01-11382-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/3b72aa897cb7/etm-24-01-11382-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/84d7cc3d1f3c/etm-24-01-11382-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/0c6d62b8a9a8/etm-24-01-11382-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/3b72aa897cb7/etm-24-01-11382-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/84d7cc3d1f3c/etm-24-01-11382-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bfc/9204561/0c6d62b8a9a8/etm-24-01-11382-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colon cancer-quality of oncologic resection evaluation in a medium volume center.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结肠癌——中等规模中心肿瘤切除质量评估
Exp Ther Med. 2022 May 20;24(1):455. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11382. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Resection margins, lymph node harvest and 3 year survival in open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery; a prospective cohort study.开放手术与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的切缘、淋巴结清扫及3年生存率:一项前瞻性队列研究
Discov Oncol. 2023 Dec 3;14(1):222. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00824-x.
3
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
Totally Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Pair Analysis.全腹腔镜与开放胃癌切除术:配对分析
Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Apr;143(2):145-154. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-9275. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除pT4期结肠癌后的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):116-125. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000641.
6
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for transverse colon cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌的短期和长期结局:一项回顾性多中心研究
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Apr 15;9:2203-9. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S103763. eCollection 2016.
7
Emergency Surgery and Oncologic Resection for Complicated Colon Cancer: What Can We Expect? A Medium Volume Experience in Romania.复杂结肠癌的急诊手术与肿瘤切除:我们能期待什么?罗马尼亚的中等病例量经验
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Mar-Apr;114(2):200-206. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.2.200.
8
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术比开放手术获得更高的淋巴结检出数和更好的短期疗效:一项大型单中心对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594.
9
Laparoscopic multivisceral resection for locally advanced colon cancer: a single-center analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜下联合脏器切除术治疗局部进展期结肠癌:单中心短期及长期疗效分析。
Surg Today. 2020 Sep;50(9):1024-1031. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01986-9. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Laparoscopic versus open radical resection for transverse colon cancer: evidence from multi-center databases.腹腔镜与开腹横结肠癌根治术的比较:多中心数据库证据。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1435-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08285-5. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术中医院及外科医生手术量与治疗结果关系的系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun;8(3):534-546. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.25.
2
National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000-2008.2000-2008 年期间,结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术的全国应用趋势。
Med J Aust. 2011 May 2;194(9):443-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03056.x.
3
Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon.
与标准结肠癌手术相比,完整的结肠系膜切除术联合中央血管结扎可提供具有更好肿瘤学效果的标本。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1448. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
4
Lymph node ratio as prognosis factor for colon cancer treated by colorectal surgeons.淋巴结比率作为结直肠外科医生治疗结肠癌的预后因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1244-50. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a65f0b.
5
The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit.腹腔镜结肠切除术的学习曲线:一名大学结直肠科外科住院医师的经验
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1603-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0497-0. Epub 2009 May 19.
6
The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗服务提供者的病例数量对癌症死亡率的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 May-Jun;59(3):192-211. doi: 10.3322/caac.20018.
7
Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer.阳性淋巴结检出率可优化结直肠癌患者的分期。
Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19;100(10):1530-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605049. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
8
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
9
Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome.结肠癌标准化手术:完整结肠系膜切除及中央结扎——技术要点与结果
Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
10
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.根据COST研究组试验的5年数据,腹腔镜结肠癌切除术并不逊色于开放手术。
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.