Mahler Simon A, McCartney Jeannie R, Swoboda Thomas K, Yorek Lauren, Arnold Thomas C
Department of Emergency Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 May 4.
Few studies have evaluated the effect of Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding on resident education.
To determine the impact of ED overcrowding on Emergency Medicine (EM) resident education.
A prospective cross-sectional study was performed from March to May 2009. Second- and third-year EM residents, blinded to the research objective, completed a questionnaire at the end of each shift. Residents were asked to evaluate the educational quality of each shift using a 10-point Likert scale. Number of patients seen and procedures completed were recorded. Responses were divided into ED overcrowding (group O) and non-ED overcrowding (group N) groups. ED overcrowding was defined as >2 h of ambulance diversion per shift. Questionnaire responses were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Number of patients and procedures were compared using unpaired T-tests.
During the study period, 125 questionnaires were completed; 54 in group O and 71 in group N. For group O, the median educational value score was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 7-10), compared to 8 (IQR 8-10) for group N (p = 0.24). Mean number of patients seen in group O was 12.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4-13.2), compared to 13.9 (95% CI 12.7-15) in group N (p = 0.034). In group O, mean number of procedures was 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.2), compared to 1.3 (95% CI 1-1.6) in group N (p = 0.047).
During overcrowding, EM residents saw fewer patients and performed fewer procedures. However, there was no significant difference in resident perception of educational value during times of overcrowding vs. non-overcrowding.
很少有研究评估急诊科过度拥挤对住院医师教育的影响。
确定急诊科过度拥挤对急诊医学住院医师教育的影响。
于2009年3月至5月进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。对研究目的不知情的二年级和三年级急诊医学住院医师在每个班次结束时完成一份问卷。要求住院医师使用10分制李克特量表评估每个班次的教育质量。记录看过的患者数量和完成的操作数量。将回答分为急诊科过度拥挤组(O组)和非急诊科过度拥挤组(N组)。急诊科过度拥挤定义为每班救护车分流时间超过2小时。使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较问卷回答。使用非配对t检验比较患者数量和操作数量。
在研究期间,共完成125份问卷;O组54份,N组71份。O组的教育价值得分中位数为8(四分位间距[IQR]7 - 10),而N组为8(IQR 8 - 10)(p = 0.24)。O组看过的患者平均数量为12.3(95%置信区间[CI]11.4 - 13.2),而N组为13.9(95%CI 12.7 - 15)(p = 0.034)。O组的操作平均数量为0.9(95%CI 0.6 - 1.2),而N组为1.3(95%CI 1 - 1.6)(p = 0.047)。
在过度拥挤期间,急诊医学住院医师看过的患者较少,进行的操作也较少。然而,住院医师在过度拥挤与非过度拥挤时期对教育价值的认知没有显著差异。