Moffett Peter, Best Al, Lewis Nathan, Miller Stephen, Hickam Grace, Kissel-Smith Hannah, Barrera Laura, Huang Scott, Moll Joel
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;26(1):53-61. doi: 10.5811/westjem.31064.
Emergency department boarding has escalated to a crisis, impacting patient care, hospital finances, and physician burnout, and contributing to error. No prior studies have examined the effects of boarding hours on resident productivity. If boarding reduces productivity, it may have negative educational impacts. We investigated the effect of boarding on resident productivity as measured by patients per hour and hypothesized that increased boarding leads to decreased productivity.
This was a retrospective study at a quaternary, urban, academic Level I trauma center from 2017-2021 with a three-year emergency medicine residency of 10-12 residents per year and annual volumes of 80,000-101,000. Boarding was defined as the time between an admission order and the patient leaving the ED. We created a multivariable mixed model with fixed covariates for year, month, day of week, resident experience, shift duration, total daily ED patients, and with residents as repeated measures. The effect of boarding was estimated after covarying out all other factors.
All variables included in the model were significantly associated with changes in productivity. Resident experience has the largest effect such that for each month of residency experience, a resident adds 0.012 patients per hour (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.010-0.014). Isolating the effect of boarding demonstrated that for every additional 100 hours of boarding, a resident's productivity decreased by 0.022 patients per hour (95% CI 0.016-0.028). In the study, the median daily boarding was 261 hours; if this were eliminated (assuming a resident completes 100 10-hour shifts annually), a resident could be expected to see 56.9 more patients per year (95% CI 40.7-73.1).
Hospital boarding significantly reduces resident productivity as measured by patients per hour. Further studies are warranted to determine the educational impact.
急诊科患者滞留问题已升级为一场危机,影响了患者护理、医院财务状况以及医生的职业倦怠,并导致了医疗差错。此前尚无研究探讨患者滞留时间对住院医师工作效率的影响。如果患者滞留会降低工作效率,那么可能会对医学教育产生负面影响。我们通过每小时诊治的患者数量来研究患者滞留对住院医师工作效率的影响,并假设患者滞留时间增加会导致工作效率下降。
这是一项在一所城市四级学术性一级创伤中心进行的回顾性研究,研究时间为2017年至2021年,每年有10至12名住院医师参加为期三年的急诊医学住院医师培训项目,每年急诊量为80,000至101,000人次。患者滞留定义为入院医嘱下达至患者离开急诊科的时间。我们创建了一个多变量混合模型,其中年份、月份、星期几、住院医师经验、轮班时长、每日急诊科患者总数为固定协变量,住院医师为重复测量因素。在排除所有其他因素后,估计患者滞留的影响。
模型中纳入的所有变量均与工作效率变化显著相关。住院医师经验的影响最大,每增加一个月的住院医师经验,住院医师每小时诊治的患者增加0.012名(95%置信区间[CI] 0.010 - 0.014)。单独分析患者滞留的影响表明,每增加100小时的患者滞留时间,住院医师的工作效率每小时下降0.022名患者(95% CI 0.016 - 0.028)。在该研究中,每日患者滞留时间的中位数为261小时;如果消除这一情况(假设一名住院医师每年完成100个10小时的轮班),预计一名住院医师每年可多诊治56.9名患者(95% CI 40.7 - 73.1)。
以每小时诊治的患者数量衡量,医院患者滞留显著降低了住院医师的工作效率。有必要进一步研究以确定其对医学教育的影响。