Suppr超能文献

比较奥沙万古霉素前负荷剂量方案与每日剂量方案的疗效和安全性:SIMPLIFI 试验分析。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oritavancin front-loaded dosing regimens to daily dosing: an analysis of the SIMPLIFI trial.

机构信息

LSU Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine at New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3476-84. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00029-11. Epub 2011 May 2.

Abstract

Oritavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide with demonstrated effectiveness against complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) caused by Gram-positive pathogens, including those caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of oritavancin is favorable for single or infrequent dosing. A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-comparator study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00514527) of single and infrequent dosing of intravenous (i.v.) oritavancin for the treatment of cSSSI caused by Gram-positive pathogens (wound infections, major abscess, and cellulitis) was undertaken to evaluate the noninferiority of front-loaded dosing regimens compared to a daily-dosing regimen. A total of 302 patients ≥ 18 years of age were randomized equally to one of three oritavancin treatment groups, receiving either a daily dose (200 mg) administered for 3 to 7 days, a single dose (1,200 mg), or an infrequent dose (800-mg dose, with the option for an additional 400 mg on day 5). The primary efficacy was defined as a clinical response in clinically evaluable (CE) patients assessed at days 21 to 29 (test of cure [TOC]). The cure rates in the CE population were 72.4% (55/76) in the daily-dose group, 81.5% (66/81) in the 1,200-mg-single-dose group, and 77.5% (55/71) in the infrequent-dose group. In patients with MRSA at baseline, the cure rates were 78.3% (18/23), 73.0% (27/37), and 87.0% (20/23) in the daily-, 1,200-mg-single-, and infrequent-dose groups, respectively; however, the study was not powered to assess outcomes in the MRSA subpopulation, and given the heterogeneity of the types of infection and the small sample size, these do not suggest any true differences in efficacy rates for these pathogens. The frequencies of adverse events were similar among treatment groups. The results of this study show that single- and infrequent-dosing schedules of oritavancin were as efficacious as daily administration and had a similar safety profile in treating cSSSI caused by Gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA.

摘要

奥他万古霉素是一种新型糖肽类抗生素,具有抗革兰氏阳性病原体引起的复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(cSSSI)的功效,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的感染。奥他万古霉素的药代动力学和药效学特征有利于单次或不频繁给药。一项针对革兰氏阳性病原体(伤口感染、大脓肿和蜂窝织炎)引起的 cSSSI 患者的静脉注射(i.v.)奥他万古霉素单次和不频繁给药的 2 期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行、阳性对照研究(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00514527),旨在评估与每日剂量相比,负荷剂量方案的非劣效性。共有 302 名年龄≥18 岁的患者被平均随机分为三组奥他万古霉素治疗组,分别接受每日剂量(200mg)治疗 3 至 7 天、单次剂量(1200mg)或不频繁剂量(800mg 剂量,第 5 天可加用 400mg)。主要疗效定义为临床可评估(CE)患者在第 21 至 29 天(治疗后评估)的临床反应。CE 人群的治愈率分别为每日剂量组 72.4%(55/76)、单次 1200mg 剂量组 81.5%(66/81)和不频繁剂量组 77.5%(55/71)。在基线时存在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的患者中,每日剂量组、单次 1200mg 剂量组和不频繁剂量组的治愈率分别为 78.3%(18/23)、73.0%(27/37)和 87.0%(20/23);然而,该研究没有足够的效力来评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌亚组的结果,并且鉴于感染类型的异质性和样本量小,这些结果并不能表明这些病原体的疗效率有任何真正的差异。各组不良反应的发生频率相似。这项研究的结果表明,奥他万古霉素的单次和不频繁给药方案与每日给药一样有效,并且在治疗革兰氏阳性病原体(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)引起的 cSSSI 方面具有相似的安全性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oritavancin front-loaded dosing regimens to daily dosing: an analysis of the SIMPLIFI trial.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3476-84. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00029-11. Epub 2011 May 2.
2
Single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2180-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310422.
5
A comparative review of the lipoglycopeptides: oritavancin, dalbavancin, and telavancin.
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Jan;30(1):80-94. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.1.80.
10
New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin.
Drugs. 2010 May 7;70(7):859-86. doi: 10.2165/11534440-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

2
The role of long-acting antibiotics in the clinical practice: a narrative review.
Infez Med. 2023 Dec 1;31(4):449-465. doi: 10.53854/liim-3104-4. eCollection 2023.
3
The Clinical Efficacy of Multidose Oritavancin: A Systematic Review.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;12(10):1498. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101498.
5
Safety of Antimicrobials for Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Anthrax: A Review.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 17;75(Suppl 3):S417-S431. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac592.
6
A Two-Dose Oritavancin Regimen Using Pharmacokinetic Estimation Analysis.
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Jun;7(Suppl 1):36-40. doi: 10.1007/s40801-020-00188-6.
7
Therapeutic compounds targeting Lipid II for antibacterial purposes.
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Aug 23;12:2613-2625. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S215070. eCollection 2019.
9
Pharmacological Basis of CD101 Efficacy: Exposure Shape Matters.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00758-17. Print 2017 Nov.
10
Real-World Experience with Oritavancin Therapy in Invasive Gram-Positive Infections.
Infect Dis Ther. 2017 Jun;6(2):277-289. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0156-z. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Oritavancin disrupts membrane integrity of Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci to effect rapid bacterial killing.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Dec;54(12):5369-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00760-10. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
2
Longitudinal analysis of the in vitro activity profile of oritavancin and comparator glycopeptides against Gram-positive organisms from Europe: 2005-2008.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Nov;36(5):474-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
3
Comparative in vitro activity profile of oritavancin against recent gram-positive clinical isolates.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Nov;53(11):4762-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00952-09. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
5
Oritavancin population pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections or bacteremia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10):4422-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00231-09. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
6
Vancomycin and oritavancin have different modes of action in Enterococcus faecium.
J Mol Biol. 2009 Oct 9;392(5):1178-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.064. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
7
9
Oritavancin kills stationary-phase and biofilm Staphylococcus aureus cells in vitro.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Mar;53(3):918-25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00766-08. Epub 2008 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验