Xceleron Ltd., The Biocentre, Innovation Way, York YO10 5NY, UK.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011 Jun 14;43(3):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
A clinical study was conducted to assess the ability of a microdose (100 μg) to predict the human pharmacokinetics (PK) following a therapeutic dose of clarithromycin, sumatriptan, propafenone, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and phenobarbital, both within the study and by reference to the existing literature on these compounds and to explore the source of any nonlinearity if seen. For each drug, 6 healthy male volunteers were dosed with 100 μg (14)C-labelled compound. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan, and propafenone this labelled dose was administered alone, i.e. as a microdose, orally and intravenously (iv) and as an iv tracer dose concomitantly with an oral non-labelled therapeutic dose, in a 3-way cross over design. The oral therapeutic doses were 250, 50, and 150 mg, respectively. Paracetamol was given as the labelled microdose orally and iv using a 2-way cross over design, whereas phenobarbital was given only as the microdose orally. Plasma concentrations of total (14)C and parent drug were measured using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) or HPLC followed by AMS. Plasma concentrations following non-(14)C-labelled oral therapeutic doses were measured using either HPLC-electrochemical detection (clarithromycin) or HPLC-UV (sumatriptan, propafenone). For all five drugs an oral microdose predicted reasonably well the PK, including the shape of the plasma profile, following an oral therapeutic dose. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan, and propafenone, one parameter, oral bioavailability, was marginally outside of the normally acceptable 2-fold prediction interval around the mean therapeutic dose value. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan and propafenone, data obtained from an oral and iv microdose were compared within the same cohort of subjects used in the study, as well as those reported in the literature. For paracetamol (oral and iv) and phenobarbital (oral), microdose data were compared with those reported in the literature only. Where 100 μg iv (14)C-doses were given alone and with an oral non-labelled therapeutic dose, excellent accord between the PK parameters was observed indicating that the disposition kinetics of the drugs tested were unaffected by the presence of therapeutic concentrations. This observation implies that any deviation from linearity following the oral therapeutic doses occurs during the absorption process.
进行了一项临床研究,以评估微剂量(100μg)预测克拉霉素、舒马曲坦、普罗帕酮、对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)和苯巴比妥治疗剂量后人体药代动力学(PK)的能力,这些化合物的研究内和文献参考均有涉及,并探索如果出现非线性的原因。对于每种药物,6 名健康男性志愿者口服 100μg(14)C 标记化合物。对于克拉霉素、舒马曲坦和普罗帕酮,单独给予标记剂量(即微剂量),经口服和静脉内(iv)给药,同时静脉内给予非标记治疗剂量作为示踪剂,采用三交叉设计。口服治疗剂量分别为 250、50 和 150mg。对乙酰氨基酚采用双交叉设计经口服和 iv 给予标记微剂量,而苯巴比妥仅经口服给予标记微剂量。使用加速器质谱(AMS)或 HPLC 后进行 AMS 测量总(14)C 和母体药物的血浆浓度。使用 HPLC-电化学检测(克拉霉素)或 HPLC-UV(舒马曲坦、普罗帕酮)测量非(14)C 标记口服治疗剂量后的血浆浓度。对于所有五种药物,口服微剂量在口服治疗剂量后,相当合理地预测了 PK,包括血浆廓清曲线的形状。对于克拉霉素、舒马曲坦和普罗帕酮,一个参数,即口服生物利用度,略超出了平均治疗剂量值的正常可接受的 2 倍预测区间。对于克拉霉素、舒马曲坦和普罗帕酮,同一研究队列的口服和 iv 微剂量数据与文献报告的数据进行了比较。对于对乙酰氨基酚(口服和 iv)和苯巴比妥(口服),微剂量数据仅与文献报告的数据进行了比较。在单独给予和与口服非标记治疗剂量一起给予 100μg iv(14)C 剂量时,观察到 PK 参数之间极好的一致性,表明所测试药物的处置动力学不受治疗浓度的影响。这一观察结果表明,口服治疗剂量后出现的任何非线性都发生在吸收过程中。