Suppr超能文献

头颈部黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检:系统评价。

Sentinel node biopsy for head and neck melanoma: a systematic review.

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Sep;145(3):375-82. doi: 10.1177/0194599811408554. Epub 2011 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review was conducted to examine the test performance of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma, including the identification rate and false-negative rate.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, ASCO, and SSO database searches were conducted to identify studies fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: sentinel node biopsy was performed, lesions were located on the head and neck, and recurrence data for both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients were reported.

REVIEW METHODS

Dual-blind data extraction was conducted. Primary outcomes included identification rate and test performance based on completion neck dissection or nodal recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 3442 patients from 32 studies published between 1990 and 2009 were reviewed. Seventy-eight percent of studies were retrospective and 22% were prospective. Trials varied from 9 to 755 patients (median 55). Mean Breslow depth was 2.53 mm. Median sentinel node biopsy identification rate was 95.2%. More than 1 basin was reported in 33.1% of patients. A median of 2.56 sentinel nodes per patient were excised. Sentinel node biopsy was positive in 15% of patients. Subsequent completion neck dissection was performed in almost all of these patients and revealed additional positive nodes in 13.67%. Median follow-up was 31 months. Across all studies, predictive value positive for nodal recurrence was 13.1% and posttest probability negative was 5%. Median false-negative rate for nodal recurrence was 20.4%.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node biopsy of head and neck melanoma is associated with an increased false-negative rate compared with studies of non-head and neck lesions. Positive sentinel node status is highly predictive of recurrence.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在检查头颈部黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检的检测性能,包括识别率和假阴性率。

资料来源

通过 PubMed、EMBASE、ASCO 和 SSO 数据库检索,以确定符合以下纳入标准的研究:进行了前哨淋巴结活检,病变位于头颈部,并且报告了转移性和非转移性患者的复发数据。

审查方法

进行了双盲数据提取。主要结局包括基于完成性颈部清扫术或淋巴结复发的识别率和检测性能。

结果

共回顾了 1990 年至 2009 年期间发表的 32 项研究中的 3442 例患者。78%的研究为回顾性,22%为前瞻性。试验范围从 9 例到 755 例患者(中位数 55 例)。平均 Breslow 深度为 2.53mm。前哨淋巴结活检的中位识别率为 95.2%。33.1%的患者报告了超过 1 个淋巴结区。中位数每例患者切除 2.56 个前哨淋巴结。15%的患者前哨淋巴结活检阳性。几乎所有这些患者都进行了后续的完成性颈部清扫术,发现了 13.67%的额外阳性淋巴结。中位随访时间为 31 个月。在所有研究中,淋巴结复发的预测值阳性为 13.1%,试验后概率阴性为 5%。淋巴结复发的中位假阴性率为 20.4%。

结论

与非头颈部病变的研究相比,头颈部黑色素瘤的前哨淋巴结活检假阴性率较高。前哨淋巴结阳性状态高度提示复发。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验