Weedon-Fekjaer Harald, Vatten Lars J, Aalen Odd O, Lindqvist Bo, Tretli Steinar
Kreftregisteret, Institute of population-based cancer research, Montebello, N-0310 , Oslo, Norway.
J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):172-8. doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732.
To assess if new screening techniques, increased use of hormone replacement therapy, or the transition from breast cancer screening trials to large scale screening programmes may influence the average time in preclinical screening detectable phase (mean sojourn time [MST]) or screening test sensitivity (STS).
Screening and interval data for 395,188 women participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme (NBCSP).
Weighted non-linear least-square regression estimates using a tree step Markov chain model, and a sensitivity analysis of the possible impact by opportunistic screening between ordinary breast cancer screening rounds.
MST was estimated to 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-7.0) years for women aged 50-59 years, and 7.9 (95% CI 6.0-7.9) years for those aged 60-69 years. Correspondingly, STS was estimated to 58% (95% CI 52-64 %) and 73 % (67-78 %), respectively. Simulations revealed that opportunistic screening may give a moderate estimation bias towards higher MST and lower STS. Assuming a probable 21% higher background incidence, due to increased hormone replacement therapy use, MST estimates decreased to 3.9 and 5.0 years for the two age groups, and STS increased to 75 and 85%.
The new estimates indicate that screening detectable phase is longer than that found in previous mammography trials/programmes, but also that the sensitivity of the screening test is lower. Overall, the NBCSP detects more cancer cases than most previous trials/programmes.
评估新的筛查技术、激素替代疗法使用的增加,或从乳腺癌筛查试验向大规模筛查计划的转变是否会影响临床前筛查可检测阶段的平均时间(平均停留时间 [MST])或筛查测试灵敏度(STS)。
对参与挪威乳腺癌筛查计划(NBCSP)的395,188名女性的筛查和间隔数据。
使用三阶段马尔可夫链模型进行加权非线性最小二乘回归估计,并对普通乳腺癌筛查轮次之间的机会性筛查的可能影响进行敏感性分析。
50 - 59岁女性的MST估计为6.1年(95%置信区间 [CI] 5.1 - 7.0),60 - 69岁女性为7.9年(95% CI 6.0 - 7.9)。相应地,STS估计分别为58%(95% CI 52 - 64%)和73%(67 - 78%)。模拟显示,机会性筛查可能会对更高的MST和更低的STS产生适度的估计偏差。假设由于激素替代疗法使用增加,背景发病率可能高出21%,两个年龄组的MST估计分别降至3.9年和5.0年,STS分别增至75%和85%。
新的估计表明,筛查可检测阶段比以前的乳房X线摄影试验/计划中发现的更长,但筛查测试的灵敏度也更低。总体而言,NBCSP检测到的癌症病例比大多数以前的试验/计划更多。