Suppr超能文献

鸽子在少数范例训练后的联想对称。

Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.

机构信息

Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283.

Abstract

The present experiment investigated whether pigeons can show associative symmetry on a two-alternative matching-to-sample procedure. The procedure consisted of a within-subject sequence of training and testing with reinforcement, and it provided (a) exemplars of symmetrical responding, and (b) all prerequisite discriminations among test samples and comparisons. After pigeons had learned two arbitrary-matching tasks (A-B and C-D), they were given a reinforced symmetry test for half of the baseline relations (B1-A1 and D1-C1). To control for the effects of reinforcement during testing, two novel, nonsymmetrical responses were concurrently reinforced using the other baseline stimuli (D2-A2 and B2-C2). Pigeons matched at chance on both types of relations, thus indicating no evidence for symmetry. These symmetrical and nonsymmetrical relations were then directly trained in order to provide exemplars of symmetry and all prerequisite discriminations for a second test. The symmetrical test relations were now B2-A2 and D2-C2 and the nonsymmetrical relations were D1-A1 and B1-C1. On this test, 1 pigeon showed clear evidence of symmetry, 2 pigeons showed weak evidence, and 1 pigeon showed no evidence. The previous training of all prerequisite discriminations among stimuli, and the within-subject control for testing with reinforcement seem to have set favorable conditions for the emergence of symmetry in nonhumans. However, the variability across subjects shows that methodological variables still remain to be controlled.

摘要

本实验旨在探究鸽子在二选一匹配样本程序中是否能表现出联想对称性。该程序包括一个有强化的被试内训练和测试序列,它提供了(a)对称反应的范例,以及(b)测试样本和比较的所有必要辨别。在鸽子学习了两个任意匹配任务(A-B 和 C-D)后,它们被给予一个强化的对称性测试,用于一半的基线关系(B1-A1 和 D1-C1)。为了控制测试期间强化的影响,使用其他基线刺激物同时强化了两个新的非对称反应(D2-A2 和 B2-C2)。鸽子在两种关系上都随机匹配,因此没有表现出对称性的证据。然后,直接训练这些对称和非对称关系,为第二次测试提供对称性的范例和所有必要的辨别。现在,对称测试关系是 B2-A2 和 D2-C2,非对称关系是 D1-A1 和 B1-C1。在这个测试中,1 只鸽子表现出明显的对称性证据,2 只鸽子表现出微弱的证据,1 只鸽子没有表现出证据。对所有刺激物之间的必要辨别进行的先前训练,以及对强化测试的被试内控制,似乎为非人类动物出现对称性创造了有利条件。然而,受试者之间的变异性表明,方法学变量仍有待控制。

相似文献

1
Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283.
2
Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/jeab.51. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
Associative symmetry and stimulus-class formation by pigeons: the role of non-reinforced baseline relations.
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
4
Failure to find symmetry in pigeons after multiple exemplar training.
Psicothema. 2014;26(4):435-41. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.352.
5
Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):467-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-467.
6
Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.115-04.
7
Associative symmetry in a spatial sample-response paradigm.
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
8
Symmetry in the pigeon with sample and comparison stimuli in different locations. II.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):119-32. doi: 10.1002/jeab.162. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):397-408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-397.
10
Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of age on delay performance and associative learning tasks in pigeons.
Learn Behav. 2023 Sep;51(3):281-294. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00565-x. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
2
Simultaneous learning of directional and non-directional stimulus relations in baboons (Papio papio).
Learn Behav. 2023 Jun;51(2):166-178. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00522-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
Abstraction, Multiple Exemplar Training and the Search for Derived Stimulus Relations in Animals.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2017 Nov 1;41(1):45-67. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
ASSOCIATIVE CONCEPT LEARNING IN ANIMALS: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):165-170. doi: 10.1002/jeab.62. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/jeab.51. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Symmetry in the pigeon with sample and comparison stimuli in different locations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jul;100(1):49-60. doi: 10.1002/jeab.31. Epub 2013 May 23.
8
Emergent relations in pigeons following training with temporal samples.
Learn Behav. 2013 Jun;41(2):192-204. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0097-z.
9
A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):283-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-283.
10
Associative symmetry in a spatial sample-response paradigm.
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Generalized Identity Matching to Sample after Multiple-Exemplar Training in Capuchin Monkeys.
Psychol Rec. 2014 Dec;64(4):693-702. doi: 10.1007/s40732-014-0035-x.
2
The search for symmetry: 25 years in review.
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):188-203. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.188.
3
Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.
4
Pigeons can learn identity or difference, or both.
Science. 1976 Jan 30;191(4225):408-9. doi: 10.1126/science.191.4225.408.
5
Matching-to-sample Performance In Rats: A Case Of Mistaken Identity?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-27.
6
On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.
7
Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399-408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-399.
8
Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385.
9
A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395-409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验