• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间样本-反应范式中的联想对称性。

Associative symmetry in a spatial sample-response paradigm.

作者信息

Vasconcelos Marco, Urcuioli Peter J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 701 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2004, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002
PMID:21238554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3059401/
Abstract

Symmetry has been difficult to observe in nonhumans mainly because they seem to perceive stimuli as a conjunction of visual, spatial, and temporal characteristics. When such characteristics are controlled, symmetry does emerge in nonhumans (cf. Frank and Wasserman, 2005; Urcuioli, 2008). Recently, however, Garcia and Benjumea (2006) reported symmetry in pigeons without controlling for temporal order. The present experiments explored their paradigm and the ingredients for their success. Experiments 1 and 2 sought to replicate their findings and to examine different symmetry measures. We found evidence for symmetry using non-reinforced choice probe tests, a latency-based test, and a reinforced consistent versus inconsistent manipulation. Experiment 3 adapted their procedure to successive matching to evaluate their contention that a choice between at least two comparisons is necessary for symmetry to emerge. Contrary to their prediction, symmetry was observed following go/no-go training. Our results confirm Garcia and Benjumea's findings, extend them to other test and training procedures, and once again demonstrate symmetry in the absence of language.

摘要

对称性在非人类中一直难以观察到,主要是因为它们似乎将刺激视为视觉、空间和时间特征的结合。当这些特征得到控制时,对称性确实会在非人类中出现(参见弗兰克和瓦瑟曼,2005年;乌尔乔利,2008年)。然而,最近,加西亚和本胡梅亚(2006年)报告了鸽子身上的对称性,且未对时间顺序进行控制。本实验探究了他们的范式及其成功的要素。实验1和实验2试图重复他们的发现,并检验不同的对称性测量方法。我们通过非强化选择探测测试、基于潜伏期的测试以及强化的一致与不一致操作,找到了对称性的证据。实验3调整了他们的程序以进行连续匹配,以评估他们的观点,即对称性的出现需要在至少两个比较之间进行选择。与他们的预测相反,在进行“是/否”训练后观察到了对称性。我们的结果证实了加西亚和本胡梅亚的发现,将其扩展到其他测试和训练程序,并再次证明了在没有语言的情况下也存在对称性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/35849150a3e3/nihms264990f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/53eea8f67756/nihms264990f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/bd7a598b18ce/nihms264990f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/82f624b561b3/nihms264990f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/2ecf109f4d8a/nihms264990f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/14df57174508/nihms264990f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/35849150a3e3/nihms264990f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/53eea8f67756/nihms264990f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/bd7a598b18ce/nihms264990f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/82f624b561b3/nihms264990f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/2ecf109f4d8a/nihms264990f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/14df57174508/nihms264990f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c3/3059401/35849150a3e3/nihms264990f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Associative symmetry in a spatial sample-response paradigm.空间样本-反应范式中的联想对称性。
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
2
Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.对于连续匹配中的联想对称性,同时进行身份训练并非必要。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/jeab.51. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.鸽子在少数范例训练后的联想对称。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283.
4
Associative symmetry and stimulus-class formation by pigeons: the role of non-reinforced baseline relations.鸽子的联想对称性与刺激类形成:非强化基线关系的作用。
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
5
A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons.鸽子的反称性效应的复制和扩展。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):283-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-283.
6
Symmetry in the pigeon with sample and comparison stimuli in different locations.在不同位置的样本和比较刺激物的鸽子中存在对称性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jul;100(1):49-60. doi: 10.1002/jeab.31. Epub 2013 May 23.
7
Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes.一些关于习得等价类中反应成员关系的测试。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):81-107. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.52-05.
8
Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence.样本反应中的组内差异对习得样本等效性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):341-58. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-341.
9
Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.联想对称性、反对称性与鸽子等价类形成理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.
10
Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.无错误条件时间辨别学习。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):1-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for response membership in stimulus classes by pigeons.鸽子对刺激类别的反应成员的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):129-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.17. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
2
Emergent relations in pigeons following training with temporal samples.鸽子在接受时间样本训练后的突发关系。
Learn Behav. 2013 Jun;41(2):192-204. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0097-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.鸽子在少数范例训练后的联想对称。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283.
2
Reflexivity in pigeons.鸽子的反射性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):267-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-267.
3
The search for symmetry: 25 years in review.对称探索:25年回顾
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):188-203. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.188.
4
Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.联想对称性、反对称性与鸽子等价类形成理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.
5
Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.未能在鸽子身上重现“职业道德”效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):383-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.68-06.
6
The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.在鸽子中,以不同反应作为本体感受样本的条件性辨别任务中对称性的出现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):65-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.67-04.
7
Toward a theory of verbal behavior.迈向言语行为理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):271-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-271.
8
Matching-to-sample Performance In Rats: A Case Of Mistaken Identity?大鼠的匹配样本表现:认错身份的案例?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-27.
9
On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior.论命名和其他符号行为的起源。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.
10
Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence.非人类尚未表现出刺激等价性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385.