Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW.
Med J Aust. 2010 Sep 6;193(S5):S52-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03929.x.
To assess the prevalence and predictors of depression and anxiety in women with ovarian cancer and their caregivers, to compare levels of depression and anxiety with community norms, and to explore the relationship between patients and their nominated caregivers.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of 798 women with invasive ovarian cancer recruited between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2006 through the nationwide Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, and 373 of their caregivers.
Depression and anxiety as assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the role of demographic variables, disease and treatment variables, psychosocial variables, and use of mental health and support services as potential predictors.
Rates of anxiety and depression among patients were significantly lower than in previous reports, although clinical depression rates (5.9%) were significantly higher than community norms (3.0%; chi2 = 24.0; P < 0.001). Caregivers also reported higher levels of depression (chi2 = 21.1; P < 0.001) and anxiety (chi2 = 17.6; P < 0.001) compared with norms. There was no difference within patient-caregiver pairs for depression (P = 0.1), while caregivers reported significantly higher anxiety than patients (P < 0.01). In patients, higher symptom burden, lower optimism and current specialist mental health treatment all significantly predicted both depression and anxiety, while lower social support was a significant predictor of patient anxiety only. In caregivers, lower social support and lower optimism were significant predictors of depression and anxiety. Patients being treated for mental health was also a predictor of their caregiver's depression.
While depression is significantly more common in women with ovarian cancer than in the general population, it is caregivers of such patients who report much higher levels of both subclinical and clinical depression and anxiety.
评估卵巢癌女性及其照顾者中抑郁和焦虑的患病率和预测因素,将其抑郁和焦虑水平与社区正常值进行比较,并探讨患者与其指定照顾者之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 798 名 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 6 月 30 日通过全国性澳大利亚卵巢癌研究招募的侵袭性卵巢癌女性患者,以及她们的 373 名照顾者。
使用医院焦虑抑郁量表评估抑郁和焦虑,以及人口统计学变量、疾病和治疗变量、心理社会变量以及心理健康和支持服务的使用作为潜在预测因素的作用。
尽管患者的临床抑郁症发生率(5.9%)明显高于社区正常值(3.0%;卡方值=24.0;P<0.001),但患者的焦虑和抑郁发生率明显低于之前的报告。照顾者也报告了更高水平的抑郁(卡方值=21.1;P<0.001)和焦虑(卡方值=17.6;P<0.001)。患者-照顾者对抑郁的评分没有差异(P=0.1),而照顾者报告的焦虑明显高于患者(P<0.01)。在患者中,更高的症状负担、更低的乐观和当前的专科心理健康治疗均显著预测了抑郁和焦虑,而较低的社会支持仅显著预测了患者的焦虑。在照顾者中,较低的社会支持和较低的乐观是抑郁和焦虑的显著预测因素。患者接受心理健康治疗也是其照顾者抑郁的预测因素。
尽管卵巢癌女性的抑郁发生率明显高于普通人群,但这些患者的照顾者报告了更高水平的亚临床和临床抑郁和焦虑。