Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Drugs Aging. 2011 May 1;28(5):369-78. doi: 10.2165/11587170-000000000-00000.
An increasing proportion of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are classified as elderly (aged ≥70 years). The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is known to reduce adverse outcomes in patients aged <70 years with high-risk ACS undergoing PCI, but conflicting findings relating to its effects in the elderly have been reported.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of abciximab in elderly high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI.
From our dedicated PCI registry we identified 2068 ACS patients with high-risk lesions that were treated with PCI. Baseline data were collected prospectively. All-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and the combination of these were primary study endpoints. All endpoints within 1 year after PCI were registered and validated. The population was subsequently stratified according to age and use of abciximab.
Elderly patients constituted 42% of the total population. They presented with more co-morbidities, were less frequently treated with abciximab and had a higher risk of reaching the combined endpoint and higher all-cause mortality than younger patients. The age/abciximab stratified analysis revealed no effect of abciximab on any of the endpoints in elderly patients (combined endpoint: no abciximab 22.6% vs abciximab 23.4%, p=0.85; all-cause mortality: no abciximab 15.4% vs abciximab 15.9%, p=0.91; TVR: no abciximab 3.4% vs abciximab 5.5%, p=0.21; MI: no abciximab 7.0% vs abciximab 8.5%, p=0.54), whereas all-cause mortality and the risk of reaching the combined endpoint were significantly reduced in younger patients (combined endpoint: no abciximab 14.0% vs abciximab 9.4%, p=0.03; all-cause mortality: no abciximab 4.5% vs abciximab 1.7%, p=0.02; TVR: no abciximab 5.5% vs abciximab 4.3%, p=0.39; MI: no abciximab 7.2% vs abciximab 6.6%, p=0.80). These findings were confirmed in our adjusted analyses.
In this large observational study we found no benefit of abciximab treatment in elderly high-risk ACS patients who underwent PCI. These findings should be taken into consideration when deciding on the treatment strategy for elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI.
越来越多需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者被归类为老年人(年龄≥70 岁)。已知糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂阿昔单抗可降低接受 PCI 的年龄<70 岁且高危 ACS 患者的不良结局,但关于其在老年人中的作用的研究结果存在冲突。
本研究旨在评估阿昔单抗在接受 PCI 的老年高危 ACS 患者中的作用。
我们从我们的专用 PCI 注册处确定了 2068 名接受 PCI 治疗的高危病变 ACS 患者。前瞻性收集基线数据。全因死亡率、靶血管血运重建(TVR)、心肌梗死(MI)和这些的组合是主要研究终点。所有 PCI 后 1 年内的终点均进行登记和验证。随后根据年龄和阿昔单抗的使用情况对人群进行分层。
老年患者占总人群的 42%。他们合并症更多,较少接受阿昔单抗治疗,达到复合终点和全因死亡率的风险高于年轻患者。年龄/阿昔单抗分层分析显示,阿昔单抗对老年患者的任何终点均无影响(复合终点:无阿昔单抗 22.6% vs 阿昔单抗 23.4%,p=0.85;全因死亡率:无阿昔单抗 15.4% vs 阿昔单抗 15.9%,p=0.91;TVR:无阿昔单抗 3.4% vs 阿昔单抗 5.5%,p=0.21;MI:无阿昔单抗 7.0% vs 阿昔单抗 8.5%,p=0.54),而年轻患者的全因死亡率和达到复合终点的风险显著降低(复合终点:无阿昔单抗 14.0% vs 阿昔单抗 9.4%,p=0.03;全因死亡率:无阿昔单抗 4.5% vs 阿昔单抗 1.7%,p=0.02;TVR:无阿昔单抗 5.5% vs 阿昔单抗 4.3%,p=0.39;MI:无阿昔单抗 7.2% vs 阿昔单抗 6.6%,p=0.80)。这些发现得到了我们调整后的分析的证实。
在这项大型观察性研究中,我们未发现阿昔单抗治疗对接受 PCI 的老年高危 ACS 患者有益。在决定接受 PCI 的老年 ACS 患者的治疗策略时,应考虑这些发现。