Suppr超能文献

采用基于QM/MM 的 FEP 方法评估简单烷基胺和酰胺的异常水合行为:在设计用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的 FBPase 抑制剂中的应用。

Use of a QM/MM-based FEP method to evaluate the anomalous hydration behavior of simple alkyl amines and amides: application to the design of FBPase inhibitors for the treatment of type-2 diabetes.

机构信息

Computer Modelling, Simulations and Design, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India 500 034.

出版信息

J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jun 1;133(21):8059-61. doi: 10.1021/ja201637q. Epub 2011 May 5.

Abstract

Standard molecular mechanics (MM) force fields predict a nearly linear decrease in hydration free energy with each successive addition of a methyl group to ammonia or acetamide, whereas a nonadditive relationship is observed experimentally. In contrast, the non-additive hydration behavior is reproduced directly using a quantum mechanics (QM)/MM-based free-energy perturbation (FEP) method wherein the solute partial atomic charges are updated at every window. Decomposing the free energies into electrostatic and van der Waals contributions and comparing the results with the corresponding free energies obtained using a conventional FEP method and a QM/MM method wherein the charges are not updated suggests that inaccuracies in the electrostatic free energies are the primary reason for the inability of the conventional FEP method to predict the experimental findings. The QM/MM-based FEP method was subsequently used to evaluate inhibitors of the diabetes drug target fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase adenosine 5'-monophosphate and 6-methylamino purine riboside 5'-monophosphate. The predicted relative binding free energy was consistent with the experimental findings, whereas the relative binding free energy predicted using the conventional FEP method differed from the experimental finding by an amount consistent with the overestimated relative solvation free energies calculated for alkylamines. Accordingly, the QM/MM-based FEP method offers potential advantages over conventional FEP methods, including greater accuracy and reduced user input. Moreover, since drug candidates often contain either functionality that is inadequately treated by MM (e.g., simple alkylamines and alkylamides) or new molecular scaffolds that require time-consuming development of MM parameters, these advantages could enable future automation of FEP calculations as well as greatly increase the use and impact of FEP calculations in drug discovery.

摘要

标准的分子力学 (MM) 力场预测,随着氨或乙酰胺中甲基的逐个添加,水合自由能几乎呈线性下降,而实验中观察到的是非加和关系。相比之下,使用基于量子力学 (QM)/MM 的自由能微扰 (FEP) 方法可以直接再现非加和的水合行为,其中在每个窗口处更新溶质部分原子电荷。将自由能分解为静电和范德华贡献,并将结果与使用常规 FEP 方法和 QM/MM 方法(其中电荷未更新)获得的相应自由能进行比较表明,静电自由能的不准确性是常规 FEP 方法无法预测实验结果的主要原因。随后,使用基于 QM/MM 的 FEP 方法评估了糖尿病药物靶标果糖-1,6-二磷酸腺苷 5'-单磷酸和 6-甲基氨基嘌呤核苷 5'-单磷酸的抑制剂。预测的相对结合自由能与实验结果一致,而使用常规 FEP 方法预测的相对结合自由能与实验结果的差异与对烷基胺计算的过高相对溶剂化自由能一致。因此,基于 QM/MM 的 FEP 方法相对于常规 FEP 方法具有潜在的优势,包括更高的准确性和更少的用户输入。此外,由于候选药物通常包含 MM 处理不当的功能(例如,简单的烷基胺和烷基酰胺)或需要耗时开发 MM 参数的新分子支架,这些优势可以实现未来 FEP 计算的自动化,并大大增加 FEP 在药物发现中的使用和影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验