Suppr超能文献

评估电子健康记录中的牙科诊断术语。

Evaluating a dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco CA 94143-0758, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):605-15.

Abstract

Standardized treatment procedure codes and terms are routinely used in dentistry. Utilization of a diagnostic terminology is common in medicine, but there is not a satisfactory or commonly standardized dental diagnostic terminology available at this time. Recent advances in dental informatics have provided an opportunity for inclusion of diagnostic codes and terms as part of treatment planning and documentation in the patient treatment history. This article reports the results of the use of a diagnostic coding system in a large dental school's predoctoral clinical practice. A list of diagnostic codes and terms, called Z codes, was developed by dental faculty members. The diagnostic codes and terms were implemented into an electronic health record (EHR) for use in a predoctoral dental clinic. The utilization of diagnostic terms was quantified. The validity of Z code entry was evaluated by comparing the diagnostic term entered to the procedure performed, where valid diagnosis-procedure associations were determined by consensus among three calibrated academically based dentists. A total of 115,004 dental procedures were entered into the EHR during the year sampled. Of those, 43,053 were excluded from this analysis because they represent diagnosis or other procedures unrelated to treatments. Among the 71,951 treatment procedures, 27,973 had diagnoses assigned to them with an overall utilization of 38.9 percent. Of the 147 available Z codes, ninety-three were used (63.3 percent). There were 335 unique procedures provided and 2,127 procedure/diagnosis pairs captured in the EHR. Overall, 76.7 percent of the diagnoses entered were valid. We conclude that dental diagnostic terminology can be incorporated within an electronic health record and utilized in an academic clinical environment. Challenges remain in the development of terms and implementation and ease of use that, if resolved, would improve the utilization.

摘要

标准化的治疗程序代码和术语在牙科中经常使用。诊断术语在医学中很常见,但目前还没有令人满意或普遍标准化的牙科诊断术语。最近在牙科信息学方面的进展为将诊断代码和术语纳入治疗计划和患者治疗历史记录的文档编制提供了机会。本文报告了在一所大型牙科学校的研究生临床实践中使用诊断编码系统的结果。一组称为 Z 代码的诊断代码和术语由牙科教师开发。诊断代码和术语被纳入电子健康记录(EHR)中,以便在研究生牙科诊所中使用。量化了诊断术语的使用情况。通过将输入的诊断术语与所执行的程序进行比较,评估了 Z 代码输入的有效性,其中有效的诊断-程序关联是通过三位校准的学术牙医达成共识来确定的。在所采样的一年中,共输入了 115004 个牙科程序。其中,有 43053 个被排除在分析之外,因为它们代表与治疗无关的诊断或其他程序。在 71951 个治疗程序中,有 27973 个被分配了诊断,总体利用率为 38.9%。在 147 个可用的 Z 代码中,有 93 个被使用(63.3%)。提供了 335 种独特的程序,在 EHR 中捕获了 2127 个程序/诊断对。总体而言,输入的诊断中有 76.7%是有效的。我们得出结论,牙科诊断术语可以纳入电子健康记录,并在学术临床环境中使用。在术语的开发、实施和易用性方面仍然存在挑战,如果这些问题得到解决,将提高其利用率。

相似文献

4
The development of a dental diagnostic terminology.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):68-76.
5
Utilization and Validity of the Dental Diagnostic System over Time in Academic and Private Practice.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/2380084418815150. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
6
Dental Faculty Accuracy When Using Diagnostic Codes: A Pilot Study.
J Dent Educ. 2017 May;81(5):554-560. doi: 10.21815/JDE.016.018.
7
Evaluation of a Dental Diagnostic Terminology Subset.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1602-1603. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190555.
9
Need for diagnostic-centric care in dentistry: A case study from the Marshfield Clinic Health System.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Feb;149(2):122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.030.
10
Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry.
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity of teledentistry examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sydney, Australia.
Aust Dent J. 2025 Jun;70(2):103-113. doi: 10.1111/adj.13053. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
AI-initiated second opinions: a framework for advanced caries treatment planning.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04551-9.
3
Determinants of Clinical Decision Making under Uncertainty in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;13(6):1076. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061076.
4
Informational Needs for Dental-Oriented Electronic Health Records from Dentists' Perspectives.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 14;11(2):266. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020266.
5
Development of quality measures to assess tooth decay outcomes from electronic health record data.
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12545. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Providing Effective Dental Care for an Ageing Population.
Int Dent J. 2022 Aug;72(4S):S39-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.011.
7
Current state of dental informatics in the field of health information systems: a scoping review.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02163-9.
8
Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):80-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740920. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200153. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200153. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Developing and Testing Electronic Health Record-Derived Caries Indices.
Caries Res. 2019;53(6):650-658. doi: 10.1159/000499700. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of a dental diagnostic terminology.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):68-76.
4
Clinical computing in general dentistry.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):344-52. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1990. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
5
The Significance of SNODENT.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:737-42.
8
A system of diagnostic codes for dental health care.
J Public Health Dent. 1999 Summer;59(3):162-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1999.tb03266.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验