Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco CA 94143-0758, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):605-15.
Standardized treatment procedure codes and terms are routinely used in dentistry. Utilization of a diagnostic terminology is common in medicine, but there is not a satisfactory or commonly standardized dental diagnostic terminology available at this time. Recent advances in dental informatics have provided an opportunity for inclusion of diagnostic codes and terms as part of treatment planning and documentation in the patient treatment history. This article reports the results of the use of a diagnostic coding system in a large dental school's predoctoral clinical practice. A list of diagnostic codes and terms, called Z codes, was developed by dental faculty members. The diagnostic codes and terms were implemented into an electronic health record (EHR) for use in a predoctoral dental clinic. The utilization of diagnostic terms was quantified. The validity of Z code entry was evaluated by comparing the diagnostic term entered to the procedure performed, where valid diagnosis-procedure associations were determined by consensus among three calibrated academically based dentists. A total of 115,004 dental procedures were entered into the EHR during the year sampled. Of those, 43,053 were excluded from this analysis because they represent diagnosis or other procedures unrelated to treatments. Among the 71,951 treatment procedures, 27,973 had diagnoses assigned to them with an overall utilization of 38.9 percent. Of the 147 available Z codes, ninety-three were used (63.3 percent). There were 335 unique procedures provided and 2,127 procedure/diagnosis pairs captured in the EHR. Overall, 76.7 percent of the diagnoses entered were valid. We conclude that dental diagnostic terminology can be incorporated within an electronic health record and utilized in an academic clinical environment. Challenges remain in the development of terms and implementation and ease of use that, if resolved, would improve the utilization.
标准化的治疗程序代码和术语在牙科中经常使用。诊断术语在医学中很常见,但目前还没有令人满意或普遍标准化的牙科诊断术语。最近在牙科信息学方面的进展为将诊断代码和术语纳入治疗计划和患者治疗历史记录的文档编制提供了机会。本文报告了在一所大型牙科学校的研究生临床实践中使用诊断编码系统的结果。一组称为 Z 代码的诊断代码和术语由牙科教师开发。诊断代码和术语被纳入电子健康记录(EHR)中,以便在研究生牙科诊所中使用。量化了诊断术语的使用情况。通过将输入的诊断术语与所执行的程序进行比较,评估了 Z 代码输入的有效性,其中有效的诊断-程序关联是通过三位校准的学术牙医达成共识来确定的。在所采样的一年中,共输入了 115004 个牙科程序。其中,有 43053 个被排除在分析之外,因为它们代表与治疗无关的诊断或其他程序。在 71951 个治疗程序中,有 27973 个被分配了诊断,总体利用率为 38.9%。在 147 个可用的 Z 代码中,有 93 个被使用(63.3%)。提供了 335 种独特的程序,在 EHR 中捕获了 2127 个程序/诊断对。总体而言,输入的诊断中有 76.7%是有效的。我们得出结论,牙科诊断术语可以纳入电子健康记录,并在学术临床环境中使用。在术语的开发、实施和易用性方面仍然存在挑战,如果这些问题得到解决,将提高其利用率。