• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在电子健康记录中使用标准化牙科诊断术语的情况。

Assessing use of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.

机构信息

Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology Department, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2013 Jan;77(1):24-36.

PMID:23314462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545411/
Abstract

Although standardized terminologies such as the International Classification of Diseases have been in use in medicine for over a century, efforts in the dental profession to standardize dental diagnostic terms have not achieved widespread acceptance. To address this gap, a standardized dental diagnostic terminology, the EZCodes, was developed in 2009. Fifteen dental education institutions in the United States and Europe have implemented the EZCodes dental diagnostic terminology. This article reports on the utilization and valid entry of the EZCodes at three of the dental schools that have adopted this standardized dental diagnostic terminology. Electronic data on the use of procedure codes with diagnostic terms from the three schools over a period from July 2010 to June 2011 were aggregated. The diagnostic term and procedure code pairs were adjudicated by three calibrated dentists. Analyses were conducted to gain insight into the utilization and valid entry of the EZCodes diagnostic terminology in the one-year period. Error proportions in the entry of diagnostic term (and by diagnostic category) were also computed. In the twelve-month period, 29,965 diagnostic terms and 249,411 procedure codes were entered at the three institutions resulting in a utilization proportion of 12 percent. Caries and periodontics were the most frequently used categories. More than 1,000 of the available 1,321 diagnostic terms were never used. Overall, 60.5 percent of the EZCodes entries were found to be valid. The results demonstrate low utilization of EZCodes in an electronic health record and raise the need for specific training of dental providers on the importance of using dental diagnostic terminology and specifically how to use the terms in the electronic record. These findings will serve to increase the use/correct use of the EZCodes dental diagnostic terminology and ultimately create a reliable platform for undertaking clinical, outcomes, and quality improvement-related research.

摘要

尽管国际疾病分类等标准化术语在医学领域已经使用了一个多世纪,但牙科专业在标准化牙科诊断术语方面的努力并未得到广泛认可。为了解决这一差距,2009 年开发了一种标准化的牙科诊断术语,即 EZCodes。美国和欧洲的 15 所牙科教育机构已经实施了 EZCodes 牙科诊断术语。本文报告了在采用这种标准化牙科诊断术语的三所牙科学校中,EZCodes 的使用情况和有效录入情况。对这三所学校在 2010 年 7 月至 2011 年 6 月期间使用与诊断术语相关的程序代码的电子数据进行了汇总。三位经过校准的牙医对诊断术语和程序代码对进行了裁决。对一年期间 EZCodes 诊断术语的使用和有效录入情况进行了分析,还计算了诊断术语(按诊断类别)录入的错误比例。在 12 个月期间,这三所机构共录入了 29965 个诊断术语和 249411 个程序代码,利用率为 12%。龋病和牙周病是使用最频繁的类别。在可用的 1321 个诊断术语中,有超过 1000 个从未使用过。总体而言,有 60.5%的 EZCodes 录入是有效的。结果表明,电子健康记录中 EZCodes 的利用率较低,这需要对牙科提供者进行特定的培训,让他们了解使用牙科诊断术语的重要性,特别是如何在电子记录中使用这些术语。这些发现将有助于增加 EZCodes 牙科诊断术语的使用/正确使用,并最终为开展临床、结果和质量改进相关研究创建一个可靠的平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/66ce4effad55/nihms387572f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/fd247dccbdc4/nihms387572f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/00bf230ee3e3/nihms387572f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/66ce4effad55/nihms387572f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/fd247dccbdc4/nihms387572f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/00bf230ee3e3/nihms387572f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee5/3545411/66ce4effad55/nihms387572f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing use of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.评估在电子健康记录中使用标准化牙科诊断术语的情况。
J Dent Educ. 2013 Jan;77(1):24-36.
2
Evaluating a dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.评估电子健康记录中的牙科诊断术语。
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):605-15.
3
The development of a dental diagnostic terminology.牙科诊断术语的发展。
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):68-76.
4
Utilization and Validity of the Dental Diagnostic System over Time in Academic and Private Practice.学术与私人诊所中牙科诊断系统随时间推移的使用情况及有效性
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/2380084418815150. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
5
Does use of an electronic health record with dental diagnostic system terminology promote dental students' critical thinking?使用带有牙科诊断系统术语的电子健康记录是否能促进牙科学生的批判性思维?
J Dent Educ. 2015 Jun;79(6):686-96.
6
More about Ontology.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Mar;142(3):251-2; author reply 252, 254; discussion 254. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0155.
7
Dental Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosis-Driven Dentistry: Strategies to Enhance Adoption of Dental Diagnostic Terminology.牙科从业者对诊断驱动型牙科的看法:增强牙科诊断术语采用率的策略
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 13;14(7):767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070767.
8
BigMouth: a multi-institutional dental data repository.大嘴:一个多机构牙科数据存储库。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1136-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002230. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
Attitudes toward and beliefs about the use of a dental diagnostic terminology: A survey of dental care providers in a dental practice.对牙科诊断术语使用的态度和看法:对一家牙科诊所的牙科护理提供者的调查。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Jun;146(6):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.02.007.
10
Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry.检测和描述牙科学中结构化数据输入界面的可用性问题。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Experiences of Dental Diagnostic Failures: A Qualitative Study Using Social Media.患者对牙科诊断失败的体验:社交媒体的定性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Apr 1;20(3):177-185. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001198. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
2
Development of quality measures to assess tooth decay outcomes from electronic health record data.开发质量措施以评估电子健康记录数据中的龋齿结果。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12545. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Dentistry and Interoperability.牙科与互操作性。

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating a dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.评估电子健康记录中的牙科诊断术语。
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):605-15.
2
The development of a dental diagnostic terminology.牙科诊断术语的发展。
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):68-76.
3
Consortium for oral health-related informatics: improving dental research, education, and treatment.口腔健康相关信息学联盟:改善牙科研究、教育和治疗。
J Dent Res. 2022 Oct;101(11):1258-1262. doi: 10.1177/00220345221100175. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Current state of dental informatics in the field of health information systems: a scoping review.口腔信息学在健康信息系统领域的现状:范围综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02163-9.
5
Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.龋病风险记录和预防:口腔电子健康记录的电子措施。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):80-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740920. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries.医疗政策和教育对邻面龋牙菌斑放射影像阅读准确性的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200153. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200153. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
7
Recording of diagnoses in public primary oral health care in a retrospective longitudinal observational study in a Finnish town: Underrepresentation of periodontitis diagnoses.在芬兰一个城镇的回顾性纵向观察研究中,对公共初级口腔保健中的诊断进行记录:牙周炎诊断的代表性不足。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):457-461. doi: 10.1002/cre2.291. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Recent Trends and Future Direction of Dental Research in the Digital Era.数字时代牙科研究的最新趋势和未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):1987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061987.
9
Improving Oral-Systemic Healthcare through the Interoperability of Electronic Medical and Dental Records: An Exploratory Study.通过电子医疗和牙科记录的互操作性改善口腔-全身医疗保健:一项探索性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):367-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688832. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Utilization and Validity of the Dental Diagnostic System over Time in Academic and Private Practice.学术与私人诊所中牙科诊断系统随时间推移的使用情况及有效性
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/2380084418815150. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
J Dent Educ. 2010 Oct;74(10):1051-65.
4
The Significance of SNODENT.SNODENT的意义。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:737-42.
5
Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century.21世纪受控医学词汇的必备条件。
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):394-403.