Suppr超能文献

评估在电子健康记录中使用标准化牙科诊断术语的情况。

Assessing use of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record.

机构信息

Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology Department, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2013 Jan;77(1):24-36.

Abstract

Although standardized terminologies such as the International Classification of Diseases have been in use in medicine for over a century, efforts in the dental profession to standardize dental diagnostic terms have not achieved widespread acceptance. To address this gap, a standardized dental diagnostic terminology, the EZCodes, was developed in 2009. Fifteen dental education institutions in the United States and Europe have implemented the EZCodes dental diagnostic terminology. This article reports on the utilization and valid entry of the EZCodes at three of the dental schools that have adopted this standardized dental diagnostic terminology. Electronic data on the use of procedure codes with diagnostic terms from the three schools over a period from July 2010 to June 2011 were aggregated. The diagnostic term and procedure code pairs were adjudicated by three calibrated dentists. Analyses were conducted to gain insight into the utilization and valid entry of the EZCodes diagnostic terminology in the one-year period. Error proportions in the entry of diagnostic term (and by diagnostic category) were also computed. In the twelve-month period, 29,965 diagnostic terms and 249,411 procedure codes were entered at the three institutions resulting in a utilization proportion of 12 percent. Caries and periodontics were the most frequently used categories. More than 1,000 of the available 1,321 diagnostic terms were never used. Overall, 60.5 percent of the EZCodes entries were found to be valid. The results demonstrate low utilization of EZCodes in an electronic health record and raise the need for specific training of dental providers on the importance of using dental diagnostic terminology and specifically how to use the terms in the electronic record. These findings will serve to increase the use/correct use of the EZCodes dental diagnostic terminology and ultimately create a reliable platform for undertaking clinical, outcomes, and quality improvement-related research.

摘要

尽管国际疾病分类等标准化术语在医学领域已经使用了一个多世纪,但牙科专业在标准化牙科诊断术语方面的努力并未得到广泛认可。为了解决这一差距,2009 年开发了一种标准化的牙科诊断术语,即 EZCodes。美国和欧洲的 15 所牙科教育机构已经实施了 EZCodes 牙科诊断术语。本文报告了在采用这种标准化牙科诊断术语的三所牙科学校中,EZCodes 的使用情况和有效录入情况。对这三所学校在 2010 年 7 月至 2011 年 6 月期间使用与诊断术语相关的程序代码的电子数据进行了汇总。三位经过校准的牙医对诊断术语和程序代码对进行了裁决。对一年期间 EZCodes 诊断术语的使用和有效录入情况进行了分析,还计算了诊断术语(按诊断类别)录入的错误比例。在 12 个月期间,这三所机构共录入了 29965 个诊断术语和 249411 个程序代码,利用率为 12%。龋病和牙周病是使用最频繁的类别。在可用的 1321 个诊断术语中,有超过 1000 个从未使用过。总体而言,有 60.5%的 EZCodes 录入是有效的。结果表明,电子健康记录中 EZCodes 的利用率较低,这需要对牙科提供者进行特定的培训,让他们了解使用牙科诊断术语的重要性,特别是如何在电子记录中使用这些术语。这些发现将有助于增加 EZCodes 牙科诊断术语的使用/正确使用,并最终为开展临床、结果和质量改进相关研究创建一个可靠的平台。

相似文献

3
The development of a dental diagnostic terminology.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):68-76.
4
Utilization and Validity of the Dental Diagnostic System over Time in Academic and Private Practice.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/2380084418815150. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
6
More about Ontology.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Mar;142(3):251-2; author reply 252, 254; discussion 254. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0155.
7
Dental Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosis-Driven Dentistry: Strategies to Enhance Adoption of Dental Diagnostic Terminology.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 13;14(7):767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070767.
8
BigMouth: a multi-institutional dental data repository.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1136-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002230. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry.
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Experiences of Dental Diagnostic Failures: A Qualitative Study Using Social Media.
J Patient Saf. 2024 Apr 1;20(3):177-185. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001198. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
2
Development of quality measures to assess tooth decay outcomes from electronic health record data.
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12545. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Dentistry and Interoperability.
J Dent Res. 2022 Oct;101(11):1258-1262. doi: 10.1177/00220345221100175. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Current state of dental informatics in the field of health information systems: a scoping review.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02163-9.
5
Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):80-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740920. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200153. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200153. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
8
Recent Trends and Future Direction of Dental Research in the Digital Era.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):1987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061987.
9
Improving Oral-Systemic Healthcare through the Interoperability of Electronic Medical and Dental Records: An Exploratory Study.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):367-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688832. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Utilization and Validity of the Dental Diagnostic System over Time in Academic and Private Practice.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):143-150. doi: 10.1177/2380084418815150. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验