Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, Room B19C, 1121 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):653-64.
This study assessed biomedical science content acquisition from problem-based learning (PBL) and its relationship to students' level of group interaction. We hypothesized that learning in preparation for exams results primarily from individual study of post-case learning objectives and that outcomes would be unrelated to students' group involvement. During dental curricular years 1 and 2, student-generated biomedical learning issues (LIs) were identified from six randomly chosen PBL cases. Knowledge and application of case concepts were assessed with quizzes based on the identified LIs prior to dissemination of the learning objectives. Students and facilitators were surveyed on students' level of group involvement for the assessed LI topics. Year 1 students had significantly higher assessment scores (p=0.0001). For both student classes, means were significantly higher for the recall item (Q1) than for the application item (Q2). Q1 scores increased along with the student's reported role for Year 1 (p=0.04). However, there was no relationship between the student's reported role and Q1 for Year 2 (p=0.20). There was no relationship between the student's reported role and Q2 for Year 1 (p=0.09) or Year 2 (p=0.19). This suggests that students' level of group involvement on the biomedical learning issues did not significantly impact students' assessment performance.
本研究评估了基于问题的学习 (PBL) 对生物医学科学内容的获取及其与学生小组互动水平的关系。我们假设,为考试做准备的学习主要源于对案例后学习目标的个人学习,而学习成果与学生的小组参与度无关。在牙科学年 1 和 2 中,从六个随机选择的 PBL 案例中确定了学生生成的生物医学学习问题 (LIs)。在学习目标传播之前,根据确定的 LIs 对知识和案例概念的应用进行了测验评估。学生和指导员对评估的 LI 主题的学生小组参与度进行了调查。一年级学生的评估分数明显更高 (p=0.0001)。对于两个学生班级,回忆项目 (Q1) 的平均值明显高于应用项目 (Q2)。对于一年级学生,Q1 分数随着学生报告的角色而增加 (p=0.04)。然而,对于二年级学生,学生报告的角色与 Q1 之间没有关系 (p=0.20)。对于一年级 (p=0.09) 或二年级 (p=0.19),学生报告的角色与 Q2 之间也没有关系。这表明,学生在生物医学学习问题上的小组参与度并没有显著影响学生的评估表现。