The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Department of Psychology, Pomona, NJ 08240, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):305-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-305.
Six pigeons responded in a visual category learning task in which the stimuli were dimensionally separable Gabor patches that varied in frequency and orientation. We compared performance in two conditions which varied in terms of whether accurate performance required that responding be controlled jointly by frequency and orientation, or selectively by frequency. Results showed that pigeons learned both category tasks, with average overall accuracies of 85.5% and 82% in the joint and selective control conditions, respectively. Although perfect performance was possible, responding for all pigeons fell short of optimality. Model comparison analyses showed that the General Linear Classifier (GLC; Ashby, 1992) provided a better account of responding in the joint control condition than unidimensional models, but a unidimensional model fitted better for the condition that required selective control by frequency. Our results show that pigeons' responding in a visual categorization task can be controlled jointly or selectively by stimulus dimensions, depending on reinforcement contingencies. However, analysis of residuals confirmed that systematic deviations of GLC predictions from the obtained data were present in both conditions, suggesting that an alternative account of responding in multidimensional category learning tasks may be necessary.
六只鸽子在一个视觉类别学习任务中做出了反应,该任务中的刺激是在频率和方向上变化的维度可分离的 Gabor 补丁。我们比较了两种条件下的表现,这两种条件在准确表现是否需要同时由频率和方向控制或选择性地由频率控制方面有所不同。结果表明,鸽子学习了这两个类别任务,在联合和选择性控制条件下的平均总体准确率分别为 85.5%和 82%。尽管可以达到完美的表现,但所有鸽子的反应都没有达到最佳水平。模型比较分析表明,通用线性分类器(GLC;Ashby,1992)比单维模型更能解释联合控制条件下的反应,但需要选择性地由频率控制的条件更适合单维模型。我们的结果表明,鸽子在视觉分类任务中的反应可以根据强化条件被刺激维度联合或选择性地控制。然而,对残差的分析证实,在两种条件下,GLC 预测与实际数据之间都存在系统偏差,这表明可能需要对多维类别学习任务中的反应提出替代解释。