Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肌肉骨骼损伤:物理治疗师对哪种更安全、更有效以及何时开始治疗的理解。

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol for acute musculoskeletal injuries: physiotherapists' understanding of which is safer, more effective, and when to initiate treatment.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Practice Senior Lecturer, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2011 Oct;27(7):482-91. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2010.527430. Epub 2011 May 6.

Abstract

Physiotherapists are primary care practitioners, and are often the first health professional to consult with patients presenting with acute sprains or strains, and such patients may ask for advice regarding medications. Paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are readily available without a prescription and are commonly used by patients. The aim of this study was to investigate New Zealand physiotherapists' knowledge regarding the comparative safety, effectiveness, and appropriate timing of paracetamol and NSAIDs for acute musculoskeletal sprains and strains. A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists currently practicing in the field of musculoskeletal physiotherapy (n = 948). Of 278 respondents (29.3%), just over half (52%) thought that NSAIDs were more effective than paracetamol in the treatment of sprains and strains. Almost half (45%) believed that NSAIDs should be withheld because of the potential for interrupting the beneficial role of inflammation in healing and that NSAIDs could increase bleeding into the injured tissue. In contrast, the majority of respondents (81%) recognised that there was no need to withhold paracetamol in the initial postinjury period. Knowledge regarding safety, effectiveness, and risks of paracetamol and NSAIDs may assist physiotherapists to recommend appropriate management of acute musculoskeletal injuries, within regulatory boundaries.

摘要

物理治疗师是初级保健医生,通常是第一个咨询急性扭伤或拉伤患者的医疗保健专业人员,这些患者可能会就药物治疗寻求建议。扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)无需处方即可轻松获得,并且患者经常使用。本研究旨在调查新西兰物理治疗师对扑热息痛和 NSAIDs 治疗急性肌肉骨骼扭伤和拉伤的相对安全性、有效性和适当时机的了解。向目前在肌肉骨骼物理治疗领域执业的新西兰物理治疗师协会的所有成员邮寄了一份问卷(n=948)。在 278 名答复者(29.3%)中,超过一半(52%)的人认为 NSAIDs 在治疗扭伤和拉伤方面比扑热息痛更有效。近一半(45%)的人认为应该避免使用 NSAIDs,因为它们可能会干扰炎症在愈合过程中的有益作用,并且 NSAIDs 会增加受伤组织的出血。相比之下,大多数答复者(81%)认识到在受伤后初期没有必要避免使用扑热息痛。对扑热息痛和 NSAIDs 的安全性、有效性和风险的了解可以帮助物理治疗师在监管范围内推荐急性肌肉骨骼损伤的适当管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验