Department of Emergency Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;71(3):357-368.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.041. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
We determine whether pain treatment with acetaminophen was not inferior to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or the combination of both in minor musculoskeletal trauma.
The Paracetamol or NSAIDs in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma Study was a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial conducted in 2 general practices and 2 emergency departments in the Netherlands. A total of 547 adults, aged 18 years and older, with acute blunt minor musculoskeletal extremity trauma were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to acetaminophen 4,000 mg/day, diclofenac 150 mg/day, or acetaminophen 4,000 mg/day+diclofenac 150 mg/day during 3 consecutive days. Patients, health care staff, and outcome assessors were blinded for treatment allocation. Follow-up for each patient was 30 days. Primary outcome measures were between-group differences in mean numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores in rest and with movement at 90 minutes after initial drug administration compared with baseline pain scores with a predefined noninferiority margin of 0.75 NRS points. Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores during 3 consecutive days and need for additional analgesia.
One hundred eighty-two patients were treated with acetaminophen, 183 with diclofenac, and 182 with combination treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed mean NRS reduction in rest -1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.50 to -0.95) and -1.72 (95% CI -2.01 to -1.44) with movement, both for acetaminophen at 90 minutes compared with baseline. Pairwise comparison in rest with diclofenac showed a difference of -0.027 (97.5% CI -0.45 to 0.39) and -0.052 (97.5% CI -0.46 to 0.36) for combination treatment. With movement, these numbers were -0.20 (97.5% CI -0.64 to 0.23) and -0.39 (97.5% CI -0.80 to 0.018), respectively. All differences were well below the predefined noninferiority margin.
Pain treatment with acetaminophen was not inferior to that with diclofenac or the combination of acetaminophen and diclofenac in acute minor musculoskeletal extremity trauma, both in rest and with movement.
我们旨在确定在治疗轻微肌肉骨骼创伤时,扑热息痛的止痛效果是否不劣于非甾体抗炎药或两者的联合治疗。
在荷兰的 2 家普通诊所和 2 家急诊室进行了一项双盲、随机临床试验,即扑热息痛或非甾体抗炎药在急性肌肉骨骼创伤中的研究。共有 547 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的急性钝性轻微肌肉骨骼四肢创伤患者,以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至扑热息痛 4000 mg/天、双氯芬酸 150 mg/天或扑热息痛 4000 mg/天+双氯芬酸 150 mg/天,连续 3 天。患者、医护人员和结局评估人员对治疗分配均设盲。每位患者的随访时间为 30 天。主要结局指标是与基线疼痛相比,初始药物治疗后 90 分钟时休息和运动时的平均数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分的组间差异,具有预先设定的非劣效性边界为 0.75 NRS 点。次要结局包括连续 3 天的 NRS 疼痛评分和需要额外镇痛。
182 名患者接受扑热息痛治疗,183 名患者接受双氯芬酸治疗,182 名患者接受联合治疗。意向治疗分析显示,与基线相比,扑热息痛在休息时的平均 NRS 评分降低 -1.23(95%置信区间[CI] -1.50 至 -0.95)和 -1.72(95% CI -2.01 至 -1.44),运动时分别为 90 分钟和运动时。与双氯芬酸的两两比较显示,在休息时的差异为 -0.027(97.5% CI -0.45 至 0.39)和 -0.052(97.5% CI -0.46 至 0.36),联合治疗时的差异为 -0.20(97.5% CI -0.64 至 0.23)和 -0.39(97.5% CI -0.80 至 0.018)。所有差异均远低于预先设定的非劣效性边界。
在急性轻微肌肉骨骼四肢创伤中,扑热息痛的止痛效果不劣于双氯芬酸或扑热息痛与双氯芬酸的联合治疗,无论是在休息时还是在运动时。