Suppr超能文献

对于体力状况相对较好的非小细胞肺癌患者,采用三线或四线化疗。

Third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with relatively good performance status.

机构信息

Chest Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 May;74(5):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim here was to explore treatment efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had failed previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of our non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in our institution from January 2006 to December 2009.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-three patients received treatment, including 85 patients with pemetrexed treatment and 38 patients with docetaxel treatment. There was no difference in tumor response rate and toxicity profiles when using pemetrexed as third- or fourth-line treatment, neither was there difference in docetaxel treatment of third- versus fourth-line treatment. There was also no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed in response rate and control rate when they were used as fourth-line treatment. However, docetaxel used in fourth-line treatment had higher incidence of neutropenia and more frequent need of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support compared with pemetrexed in fourth-line treatment. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 months and 3.8 months when using pemetrexed as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.417). Median PFSs were 3.8 months and 4.8 months when using docetaxel as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.882). There was also no difference in PFS between pemetrexed and docetaxel, both in third- and fourth-line treatment. Median survivals were 13.4, 12.2, 13.2, and 13 months for pemetrexed in third-line, fourth-line, and docetaxel in third-line and fourth-line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of pemetrexed and docetaxel showed relatively safe toxicity profile, reasonable response rate, and long survival when used as third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. Thus, it is reasonable to give good performance status patients third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is needed for better clarification of these issues.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是探讨培美曲塞和多西他赛在非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效,这些患者先前的化疗和表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2006 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月在我院接受三线或四线培美曲塞或多西他赛化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料。

结果

123 例患者接受了治疗,其中 85 例接受了培美曲塞治疗,38 例接受了多西他赛治疗。三线或四线使用培美曲塞治疗时,肿瘤反应率和毒性谱无差异,三线与四线使用多西他赛治疗时也无差异。当它们被用作四线治疗时,多西他赛和培美曲塞的反应率和控制率也没有差异。然而,与四线培美曲塞治疗相比,四线多西他赛治疗的中性粒细胞减少发生率更高,更频繁需要粒细胞集落刺激因子支持。三线和四线使用培美曲塞治疗的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 2.6 个月和 3.8 个月(p=0.417)。三线和四线使用多西他赛治疗的中位 PFS 分别为 3.8 个月和 4.8 个月(p=0.882)。在三线和四线治疗中,培美曲塞和多西他赛之间的 PFS 也没有差异。培美曲塞三线、四线和多西他赛三线、四线治疗的中位生存期分别为 13.4、12.2、13.2 和 13 个月。

结论

本回顾性研究表明,培美曲塞和多西他赛作为三线和四线化疗具有相对安全的毒性谱、合理的反应率和较长的生存时间。因此,对于身体状况良好的患者给予三线和四线化疗是合理的。需要进行 III 期随机试验以更好地阐明这些问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验