• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 CKD-EPI 公式在肾移植患者中的应用。

Validation of the CKD-EPI formula in patients after renal transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):4104-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr183. Epub 2011 May 5.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfr183
PMID:21551088
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the management of patients after kidney transplantation (KTx). Recently, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was introduced to estimate GFR in chronic kidney disease patients. However, to date the diagnostic value of this equation remains to be determined in patients after KTx.

METHODS

We analysed the CKD-EPI formula in comparison to the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation in 170 stable patients after renal transplantation. Correlation, bias, precision and accuracy within 30 and 50% of true GFR were determined. GFR was measured by technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid clearance [39.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 37.3-42.0 mL/min/1.73m(2)].

RESULTS

The results for the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations correlated well with GFR (0.82; 0.83, respectively). GFR calculated by MDRD (44.1, 95% CI: 41.6-46.8 mL/min/1.73m(2)) and CKD-EPI (47.7, 95% CI: 44.7-50.7 mL/min/1.73m(2)) overestimated true GFR significantly (P < 0.001). Precision was not significantly different between MDRD and CKD-EPI (10.9 versus 10.0 mL/min/1.73m(2), respectively). Accuracy within 30% of true GFR was significantly higher for MDRD (71.8%) than for CKD-EPI (64.1%, P = 0.0014). Accuracy within 50% of true GFR did not differ significantly (MDRD: 89.4% versus CKD-EPI: 84.7%, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The new CKD-EPI formula did not improve the estimation of GFR in Caucasian patients after renal transplantation in this study.

摘要

背景

准确计算肾小球滤过率(GFR)对于肾移植(KTx)患者的管理至关重要。最近,慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)公式被引入用于估算慢性肾脏病患者的 GFR。然而,迄今为止,该方程在 KTx 后的患者中的诊断价值仍有待确定。

方法

我们分析了在 170 例肾移植后稳定的患者中,CKD-EPI 公式与重新表达的肾脏病饮食改良公式(MDRD)的比较。确定了在真实 GFR 的 30%和 50%以内的相关性、偏差、精度和准确性。GFR 通过锝-二乙三胺五乙酸清除率测定[39.6,95%置信区间(CI):37.3-42.0 mL/min/1.73m(2)]。

结果

MDRD 和 CKD-EPI 方程的结果与 GFR 相关性良好(0.82;0.83)。MDRD 计算的 GFR(44.1,95%CI:41.6-46.8 mL/min/1.73m(2))和 CKD-EPI(47.7,95%CI:44.7-50.7 mL/min/1.73m(2))显著高估了真实 GFR(P < 0.001)。MDRD 和 CKD-EPI 之间的精度没有显著差异(分别为 10.9 和 10.0 mL/min/1.73m(2))。在真实 GFR 的 30%以内,MDRD 的准确性明显高于 CKD-EPI(71.8%比 64.1%,P = 0.0014)。在真实 GFR 的 50%以内,准确性没有显著差异(MDRD:89.4%比 CKD-EPI:84.7%,P = 0.06)。

结论

在这项研究中,新的 CKD-EPI 公式并没有改善白人肾移植后患者 GFR 的估计。

相似文献

1
Validation of the CKD-EPI formula in patients after renal transplantation.验证 CKD-EPI 公式在肾移植患者中的应用。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):4104-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr183. Epub 2011 May 5.
2
Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in patients with liver disease: the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation is not better.基于肌酐的肾小球滤过率估计在肝病患者中的应用:新的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作方程并没有更好。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;23(11):969-73. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834991f1.
3
Simple cystatin C formula compared to sophisticated CKD-EPI formulas for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in the elderly.与复杂的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组(CKD-EPI)公式相比,简单的胱抑素C公式用于估算老年人的肾小球滤过率。
Ther Apher Dial. 2011 Jun;15(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00948.x.
4
CKD-EPI instead of MDRD for candidates to kidney donation.用 CKD-EPI 取代 MDRD 作为候选肾脏捐献者的评估方法。
Transplantation. 2012 Sep 27;94(6):637-41. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182603260.
5
Validation of the Lund-Malmö, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in a large Swedish clinical population.验证Lund-Malmö方程、慢性肾脏病流行病学(CKD-EPI)方程和肾脏疾病饮食改良(MDRD)方程在瑞典大型临床人群中估算肾小球滤过率的情况。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;46(3):212-22. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2011.644859. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Can modifications of the MDRD formula improve the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in renal allograft recipients?对肾病膳食改良试验(MDRD)公式的修正能否改善肾移植受者肾小球滤过率的估算?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Dec;22(12):3610-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm282. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
7
Validation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in advanced chronic renal failure.验证慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组(CKD-EPI)方程在晚期慢性肾衰竭中的应用。
Nefrologia. 2011;31(6):677-82. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Sep.11014.
8
[Assessment of the new CKD-EPI equation to estimate the glomerular filtration rate].[评估用于估算肾小球滤过率的新型CKD-EPI方程]
Nefrologia. 2010;30(2):185-94. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2009.Dic.5838. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
9
MDRD versus CKD-EPI equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients.MDRD 方程与 CKD-EPI 方程在肾移植受者肾小球滤过率估算中的比较。
Transplantation. 2013 May 27;95(10):1211-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318288caa6.
10
The CKD-EPI and MDRD equations to estimate GFR. Validation in the Swedish Lund-Malmö Study cohort.CKD-EPI 和 MDRD 方程估算 GFR。在瑞典隆德-马尔默研究队列中的验证。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011 Apr;71(2):129-38. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2010.543143. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Comparing a Novel Equation With Commonly Used Equations in this Population.估算肾移植受者的肾小球滤过率:将一种新方程与该人群常用方程进行比较。
Transplant Direct. 2017 Nov 8;3(12):e332. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000742. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Comparisons of GFR estimation using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and other creatinine-based equations in Asian population: a systematic review.亚洲人群中使用慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组织(CKD-EPI)方程及其他基于肌酐的方程估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的比较:一项系统评价
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Sep;48(9):1511-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1357-1. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
Accuracy and precision of the CKD-EPI and MDRD predictive equations compared with glomerular filtration rate measured by inulin clearance in a Saudi population.
在沙特人群中,将慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组(CKD-EPI)和肾脏病饮食改良试验(MDRD)预测方程的准确性和精密度与通过菊粉清除率测量的肾小球滤过率进行比较。
Ann Saudi Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):128-34. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.28.3.1715. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
4
Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker.肾移植中肾小球滤过率的评估:仍在寻找最佳标志物。
World J Nephrol. 2015 Jul 6;4(3):345-53. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i3.345.
5
Biomarkers in chronic kidney disease, from kidney function to kidney damage.慢性肾脏病中的生物标志物,从肾功能到肾损伤。
World J Nephrol. 2015 Feb 6;4(1):57-73. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.57.
6
Chapter 1: Definition and classification of CKD.第1章:慢性肾脏病的定义和分类。
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2013 Jan;3(1):19-62. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.64.
7
Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.基于肌酐的肾小球滤过率估算方程在实体器官移植受者中的表现。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Jun;63(6):1007-18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.436. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
8
The applicability of eGFR equations to different populations.eGFR 方程在不同人群中的适用性。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013 Sep;9(9):513-22. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.143. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
9
Comparison of estimating equations for the prediction of glomerular filtration rate in kidney donors before and after kidney donation.比较肾捐献前后肾小球滤过率预测的估计方程。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e60720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060720. Print 2013.
10
Overestimation of carboplatin doses is avoided by radionuclide GFR measurement.放射性核素 GFR 测量可避免卡铂剂量过高估计。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1310-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.393. Epub 2012 Aug 30.