• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通实践中结直肠癌筛查的障碍:全科医生和患者的定性研究。

Obstacles to colorectal screening in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs and patients.

机构信息

Département de médecine générale, Denis Diderot University Paris 7, 16 rue Henri, Huchard 75018, Paris, France.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):670-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr020. Epub 2011 May 6.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmr020
PMID:21551256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has proven efficiency at screening populations for an average risk of colorectal cancer. Mortality related to this cancer decreases by 15-18% among adults, 50-74 years old, tested every 2 years. A participation rate of at least 50% is desirable. This rate has not yet been reached in most French regions.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the obstacles to mass colorectal screening in France.

METHOD

In 2009, five focus groups were conducted in different areas to explore physicians' obstacles to FOBT screening. The patients' obstacles were assessed in semi-structured interviews. A purposive sampling had been carried out for both GPs and patients. The focus groups were coded using Nvivo 8(®) software by three researchers; the interviews manually coded by two researchers.

RESULTS

GPs reported insufficient training and some doubted the relevance of screening. They expressed concern of having insufficient time for the test during a consultation, as well as practical and administrative obstacles. Some GPs experienced difficulty persuading patients who had no signs of colorectal disease. Obstacles for patients were mainly difficulties in doing screening themselves and a perception of health care that didn't match with screening. Information and organization were also important points to improve. The screening process was considered complex both by GPs and by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous obstacles to colorectal screening, from both the physicians' and the patients' perspectives, were found. The major goal to improve mass screening may be to increase awareness and understanding of both physicians and patients regarding this process.

摘要

背景

粪便潜血试验(FOBT)已被证明可有效用于筛查普通人群的结直肠癌风险。50-74 岁的成年人每两年接受一次测试,可使该癌症的死亡率降低 15-18%。期望参与率至少达到 50%。但在法国大多数地区,尚未达到这一水平。

目的

探索法国大规模结直肠癌筛查的障碍。

方法

2009 年,在不同地区进行了五次焦点小组讨论,以探讨医生进行 FOBT 筛查的障碍。通过半结构化访谈评估患者的障碍。对全科医生和患者进行了有针对性的抽样。使用 Nvivo 8(®)软件对焦点小组进行了三位研究人员的编码;访谈由两位研究人员手动编码。

结果

全科医生报告说培训不足,一些人怀疑筛查的相关性。他们表示担心在咨询期间没有足够的时间进行测试,还存在实际和行政方面的障碍。一些全科医生在说服没有结直肠疾病迹象的患者方面存在困难。患者的障碍主要是自行进行筛查的困难以及对医疗保健的看法与筛查不符。信息和组织也是需要改进的重点。筛查过程被认为既复杂又复杂全科医生和患者。

结论

从医生和患者的角度发现了许多结直肠癌筛查的障碍。提高大规模筛查的主要目标可能是提高医生和患者对这一过程的认识和理解。

相似文献

1
Obstacles to colorectal screening in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs and patients.普通实践中结直肠癌筛查的障碍:全科医生和患者的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):670-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr020. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
Colorectal cancer screening practise is influenced by ethnicity of medical practitioner and patient.结直肠癌筛查实践受医疗从业者和患者种族的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06872.x.
3
The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT.两面之见:关于使用粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的社区和医学观点的定性研究
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.015.
4
Would general practitioners support a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of faecal-occult blood testing?全科医生会支持基于人群的粪便潜血检测结直肠癌筛查项目吗?
Intern Med J. 2004 Sep-Oct;34(9-10):532-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00652.x.
5
Survey on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practice physicians in Lazio, Italy.意大利拉齐奥地区全科医生对结直肠癌筛查的知识、态度及实践的调查
Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.010. Epub 2004 Dec 30.
6
What is the role of family in promoting faecal occult blood test screening? Exploring physician, average-risk individual, and family perceptions.家庭在促进粪便潜血试验筛查中的作用是什么?探索医生、一般风险个体和家庭的看法。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;36(3):e190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
7
Delivering the faecal occult blood test: More instructions than shared decisions. A qualitative study among French GPs.提供粪便潜血试验:更多的是指令而不是共同决策。法国全科医生中的定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;19(3):150-7. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.780162.
8
General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study.全科医生对基于人群的肠道筛查的认知及其对医疗实践的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0610-8.
9
The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France.法国全科医生推广结直肠癌群体筛查的原因。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Jun;7(2):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0339-0.
10
Colorectal cancer mass screening event utilising quantitative faecal occult blood test.利用定量粪便潜血试验进行的结直肠癌群体筛查活动。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Apr;50(4):348-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience and satisfaction of participants in colorectal cancer screening programs: a qualitative evidence synthesis.结直肠癌筛查项目参与者的经验和满意度:定性证据综合分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):2293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19678-1.
2
Familial colonoscopic screening: how do French general practitioners deal with patients and their high-risk relatives. A qualitative study.家族性结肠镜筛查:法国全科医生如何处理患者及其高危亲属。一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):182-190. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2089353.
3
Reasons for intending to accept or decline kidney cancer screening: thematic analysis of free text from an online survey.
接受或拒绝肾癌筛查的意愿的原因:对在线调查的自由文本的主题分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 18;11(5):e044961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044961.
4
The Impact of Sedation on Adenoma Detection Rate and Cecal Intubation Rate in Colonoscopy.镇静对结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率和盲肠插管率的影响。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Dec 16;2020:3089094. doi: 10.1155/2020/3089094. eCollection 2020.
5
Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.阳性结直肠癌筛查试验结果后不遵守结肠镜检查建议的动机:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Dec;38(4):487-498. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Engagement of General Practice in an Australian Organised Bowel Cancer Screening Program: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge and Practice.澳大利亚组织性结直肠癌筛查计划中全科医生的参与:知识和实践的横断面调查。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul 1;21(7):2099-2107. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.7.2099.
7
A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe.一项关于结肠镜检查的调查显示,欧洲各地对其保护价值的理解很差,而且存在广泛的误解。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233490. eCollection 2020.
8
Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice.患者对结直肠癌筛查的看法及全科医疗的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 29;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0997-5.
9
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context.全科医生对结直肠癌筛查的看法及其对粪便免疫化学检测阳性患者的潜在影响:一项来自荷兰的探索性定性研究
BJGP Open. 2019 Mar 20;3(1):bjgpopen18X101631. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101631. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Have we increased our efforts to identify strategies which encourage colorectal cancer screening in primary care patients? A review of research outputs over time.我们是否加大了力度来确定鼓励初级保健患者进行结直肠癌筛查的策略?对一段时间内研究成果的综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 May 21;11:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.015. eCollection 2018 Sep.