Norgine Ltd., Medical Affairs, Harefield, United Kingdom.
Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233490. eCollection 2020.
Colonoscopy is a valuable screening tool for colorectal cancer. However, patients experience anxiety when faced with attending a first colonoscopy, and negative attitudes may contribute to non-attendance. Few studies in Europe have explored these attitudes, despite increasing colorectal cancer incidence.
We conducted an online survey of the public in five European Union countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK), with the aim of understanding public knowledge of, perceptions of, and attitudes towards, colonoscopy and bowel preparation, amongst colonoscopy-naïve respondents. Attitudes towards colonoscopy were also gathered from colonoscopy-experienced patients.
Survey answers were gathered from 2,500 colonoscopy-naïve respondents and 500 colonoscopy-experienced patients, divided equally between countries.
Across Europe, 72% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents showed receptiveness to colonoscopy if advised by their doctor to receive one, but only 45% understood its use to prevent colorectal cancer. Forty-three percent of colonoscopy-experienced respondents would still be embarrassed about having another colonoscopy, although 59% said that the experience had been better than expected. Colonoscopy-experienced respondents had greater aversion to bowel preparation than colonoscopy-naïve respondents (47% vs 26%), and 67% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents thought that only 1 litre of bowel preparation or less is required. Italians and the Spanish wanted more information than on average in Europe, while Germans had more realistic expectations of bowel preparation.
There are perceptual gaps amongst the public around the purpose of colonoscopies, the subjective experience of the colonoscopy procedure, and the quantity of bowel preparation needed. These concerns could be mitigated by better education and using lower-volume bowel preparation techniques.
Europeans would have a colonoscopy, but its preventive medical purpose is poorly understood and there are misconceptions around the process. Further education about the procedure, its benefits and bowel preparation is vital to improve understanding and compliance.
结肠镜检查是结直肠癌的一种有价值的筛查工具。然而,患者在接受首次结肠镜检查时会感到焦虑,而负面态度可能导致他们不去就诊。尽管欧洲的结直肠癌发病率不断上升,但很少有研究探讨过这些态度。
我们在五个欧盟国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国)对公众进行了一项在线调查,旨在了解结肠镜检查和肠道准备在结肠镜检查初筛者中的知识、看法和态度。我们还从有过结肠镜检查经验的患者中收集了他们对结肠镜检查的态度。
调查回答来自 2500 名结肠镜检查初筛者和 500 名有过结肠镜检查经验的患者,在各国的分配比例均等。
在整个欧洲,72%的结肠镜检查初筛者表示,如果医生建议他们接受结肠镜检查,他们会愿意接受,但只有 45%的人了解其用于预防结直肠癌的用途。43%有过结肠镜检查经验的受访者仍会对再次进行结肠镜检查感到尴尬,尽管 59%的人表示检查体验好于预期。有过结肠镜检查经验的受访者比结肠镜检查初筛者更反感肠道准备(47%比 26%),67%的结肠镜检查初筛者认为只需要 1 升或更少的肠道准备液。意大利人和西班牙人比欧洲平均水平更希望获得更多的信息,而德国人对肠道准备的期望更现实。
公众对结肠镜检查的目的、结肠镜检查过程的主观体验以及所需的肠道准备液量存在认知差距。通过更好的教育和使用低容量的肠道准备技术,可以减轻这些担忧。
欧洲人会接受结肠镜检查,但他们对其预防性医疗目的了解不足,并且对该过程存在误解。进一步教育公众了解该程序、其益处和肠道准备情况对于提高理解和依从性至关重要。