The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Aug;38(4):412-22. doi: 10.1177/1090198110382503. Epub 2011 May 6.
This two-phase evaluation documented the delivery and effectiveness of evidence-based health education methods by regular staff to pregnant smokers. During Phase 1, a total of 436 Medicaid patients were screened and 416 (95%) gave consent: 334 nonsmokers and 102 smokers. This historical Comparison (C) group was assessed to document the "normal" pretrial smoking prevalence, patient nondisclosure (deception), and cessation rates at the first prenatal visit and during care. After this study, a formative evaluation of SCRIPT methods was conducted among 139 experimental group patients and 126 control group patients. During Phase 2, a total of 6,514 patients were screened over a 36-month period: 1,736 (27%) were smokers and 1,340 (77%) gave consent. After randomization, 247 became ineligible. The remaining 1,093 smokers received brief routine advice to quit. The experimental group (n = 544) also received a Commit to Quit video, A Pregnant Woman's Guide to Quit Smoking, and counseling. Self-reports and saliva were collected at baseline, ≥60 days, and ≤90 days postpartum for cotinine analyses to document cessation and significant reduction (SR) rates. The Phase 1 formative evaluation documented a 24% nondisclosure rate at the onset of care. It also confirmed a significantly higher experimental (17.3%) versus control group (8.8%) cessation rate and experimental versus control group SR rates of 22% and 16%. During Phase 2, unplanned policy changes, and delivery of experimental group counseling procedures to 15% to 20% of control group patients, resulted in a final experimental group cessation rate of 12% and a control group rate of 10%. The experimental group SR rate of 18%, however, was significantly higher than the control group SR rate of 13%. Effectiveness varied by the stability of clinic infrastructure, and degree of fidelity of staff performance of assessment and intervention procedures. The methods and results of this study will assist future health education programs for pregnant smokers to plan and conduct process and impact evaluations in prenatal care.
本两阶段评价记录了常规工作人员向孕妇吸烟者提供循证健康教育方法的情况和效果。在第一阶段,共有 436 名医疗补助患者接受了筛查,其中 416 名(95%)同意参与:334 名非吸烟者和 102 名吸烟者。该历史对照(C)组的评估记录了首次产前检查和孕期护理时的“正常”孕前吸烟率、患者隐瞒(欺骗)率和戒烟率。在这项研究之后,对 SCRIPT 方法进行了 139 名实验组患者和 126 名对照组患者的形成性评价。在第二阶段,在 36 个月的时间里,共有 6514 名患者接受了筛查:1736 名(27%)为吸烟者,其中 1340 名(77%)同意参与。随机分组后,有 247 名患者不符合条件。其余 1093 名吸烟者接受了简短的常规戒烟建议。实验组(n=544)还接受了戒烟视频、《孕妇戒烟指南》和咨询。在基线、≥60 天和≤90 天产后收集自我报告和唾液样本来进行可替宁分析,以记录戒烟和显著减少(SR)率。第一阶段的形成性评价记录了在开始护理时的 24%的隐瞒率。它还证实了实验组(17.3%)与对照组(8.8%)的戒烟率显著更高,实验组与对照组的 SR 率分别为 22%和 16%。在第二阶段,由于计划外政策变化,以及向 15%至 20%的对照组患者提供实验组咨询程序,最终实验组的戒烟率为 12%,对照组的戒烟率为 10%。然而,实验组的 SR 率为 18%,显著高于对照组的 SR 率 13%。有效性因诊所基础设施的稳定性和员工评估和干预程序执行的保真度而异。本研究的方法和结果将有助于未来为孕妇吸烟者计划和开展产前保健中的过程和影响评价的健康教育项目。