• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉入路行急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死及高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:无心胸外科支持的单中心经验。

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk patients: experience in a single centre without cardiothoracic surgical backup.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2011 Apr;52(4):257-62.

PMID:21552786
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) is shown to be efficacious in stable patients with acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the application of primary TRI for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), including among high-risk patients from our registry.

METHODS

This was a single-centre case series comprising 138 patients who underwent primary TRI for STEMI between May 2007 and June 2008. TRI was attempted with a 6-Fr guiding catheter in all patients regardless of Killip class status. Outcome measures were success rates of primary TRI, door-to-balloon time, procedure duration and volume of contrast used. All patients were followed up for major adverse cardiac events in-hospital, at 30 days and six months.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients had primary TRI attempted for STEMI. Four patients failed primary TRI and required a femoral approach. The remaining 134 patients underwent primary TRI. The mean patient age was 56.4 years. Most patients with acute STEMI presented in Killip class I and II (91.8 percent). Only 8.2 percent were in Killip class III or IV on admission. 50 percent of patients presented with anterior STEMI. The median door-to-balloon time for this group was 92 (interquartile range [IQR] 77-121) minutes, with a median procedure time of 39 (IQR 29-51) minutes. The success rate of primary TRI was 97.1 percent.

CONCLUSION

Success rate, procedural and radiation time for TRI are comparable to those achieved via the femoral approach. Primary TRI is therefore a feasible and effective approach for acute STEMI, even in high-risk patients.

摘要

简介

经桡动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)已被证实对急性冠状动脉综合征稳定型患者有效。我们旨在评估原发性 TRI 在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中的应用,包括我们注册中心的高危患者。

方法

这是一项单中心病例系列研究,共纳入 138 例于 2007 年 5 月至 2008 年 6 月期间因 STEMI 行直接 TRI 的患者。所有患者均尝试使用 6Fr 引导导管进行 TRI,无论 Killip 分级状态如何。主要观察终点为原发性 TRI 的成功率、门球时间、手术时间和造影剂用量。所有患者均进行院内、术后 30 天和 6 个月的主要不良心脏事件随访。

结果

共有 138 例患者因 STEMI 行直接 TRI。4 例患者因原发性 TRI 失败而改行股动脉入路。其余 134 例患者成功接受了原发性 TRI。患者平均年龄为 56.4 岁。大多数急性 STEMI 患者就诊时 Killip 分级为 I 级和 II 级(91.8%)。入院时仅 8.2%的患者为 Killip 分级 III 级或 IV 级。50%的患者表现为前壁 STEMI。该组患者的中位门球时间为 92(四分位距 [IQR] 77-121)分钟,中位手术时间为 39(IQR 29-51)分钟。原发性 TRI 的成功率为 97.1%。

结论

TRI 的成功率、手术时间和辐射时间与股动脉入路相当。因此,原发性 TRI 是急性 STEMI 的一种可行且有效的方法,即使在高危患者中也是如此。

相似文献

1
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk patients: experience in a single centre without cardiothoracic surgical backup.经桡动脉入路行急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死及高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:无心胸外科支持的单中心经验。
Singapore Med J. 2011 Apr;52(4):257-62.
2
Reducing needle-to-balloon time by using a single guiding catheter during transradial primary coronary intervention.经桡动脉行直接冠状动脉介入治疗中使用单根指引导管以减少球囊扩张时间。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Aug;25(4):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00717.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
3
In-hospital outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital: 11 years of experience.朱拉隆功国王纪念医院原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内结局:11年经验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jul;95(7):866-73.
4
Comparison of door-to-balloon times for primary PCI using transradial versus transfemoral approach.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的门球时间比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun 1;75(7):991-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22425.
5
Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死患者经桡动脉途径行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性与可行性
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 5;121(9):782-6.
6
Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.印度急性心肌梗死患者经桡动脉直接血管成形术和支架置入术:急性结果及6个月随访
Indian Heart J. 2005 Nov-Dec;57(6):681-7.
7
A single-center experience of transitioning from a routine transfemoral to a transradial intervention approach in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Impact on door-to-balloon time and clinical outcomes.单中心经验:从常规经股动脉到经桡动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的转变:对门球时间和临床结果的影响。
J Cardiol. 2013 Jul;62(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
8
Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左侧与右侧桡动脉入路的手术时间、成功率和安全性比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):38-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22843. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
9
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
10
[The in-hospital outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after transradial intervention in patients with coronary artery disease].[冠心病患者经桡动脉介入治疗后的院内结局及主要不良心脏事件的预测因素]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2011 Mar;39(3):208-11.