Decaestecker C, Camby I, Salmon I, Brotchi J, Pasteels J, Kiss R, Vanham P
FREE UNIV BRUSSELS,FAC MED,HISTOL LAB,B-1070 BRUSSELS,BELGIUM. FREE UNIV BRUSSELS,INST RECH INTERDISCIPLINAIRES & DEV INTELLIGENCE,BRUSSELS,BELGIUM. HOP ERASME,SERV ANAT PATHOL,BRUSSELS,BELGIUM. HOP ERASME,SERV NEUROCHIRURG,BRUSSELS,BELGIUM. FREE UNIV BRUSSELS,FAC SCI APPL,DEPT SYST NUMER & LOG,BRUSSELS,BELGIUM.
Int J Oncol. 1995 Jul;7(1):183-9. doi: 10.3892/ijo.7.1.183.
A systematic and thus objective method is proposed to characterize astrocytic tumor aggressiveness. This method relies upon the combined use of a specific decisional algorithm (the decision tree) and 23 parameters which include 15 morphonuclear parameters describing the geometric, densitometric, and textural features of a cell nucleus, and 8 parameters describing the various levels of nuclear DNA content. These 23 parameters were objectively quantified by means of the digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. This methodology was used to investigate whether it could be applied as a diagnostic tool. The biological model chosen included 12 cell lines adapted to grow in vitro and stemming from 4 astrocytomas (weakly malignant astrocytic tumors) and 6 glioblastomas (highly malignant ones). The 2 additional cell lines were from two medulloblastomas (MED) (2 highly malignant primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors). The results demonstrate unambiguously that it is actually possible to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade tumors on the basis of these parameters, which describe their morphonuclear features and the amount of their nuclear content. However, a clear-cut distinction between these different types of tumors can only be attained when a specific technique is used. In the present case this was the decision tree technique. We were not able to distinguish between these various histopathological groups when we used conventional statistical methods including the one-way-variance analysis of data or the carrying out of the X(2) test.
本文提出了一种系统且客观的方法来表征星形细胞瘤的侵袭性。该方法依赖于特定决策算法(决策树)与23个参数的联合使用,其中包括15个形态核参数,用于描述细胞核的几何、密度和纹理特征,以及8个描述核DNA含量不同水平的参数。通过对福尔根染色细胞核进行数字细胞图像分析,客观地量化了这23个参数。本研究采用该方法来探究其是否可作为一种诊断工具。所选用的生物学模型包括12种适应体外生长的细胞系,它们来源于4例星形细胞瘤(低度恶性星形细胞瘤)和6例胶质母细胞瘤(高度恶性)。另外2种细胞系来自2例髓母细胞瘤(MED)(2种高度恶性的原始神经外胚层肿瘤)。结果明确表明,基于这些描述肿瘤形态核特征及其核含量的参数,确实有可能区分低级别和高级别肿瘤。然而,只有使用特定技术才能对这些不同类型的肿瘤进行明确区分。在本研究中,该技术为决策树技术。当我们使用包括数据单向方差分析或进行X(2)检验在内的传统统计方法时,无法区分这些不同的组织病理学组。