• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宣传流感预防——2009-2010 年 H1N1 大流行期间通过宣传标志促进手部卫生的实验性现场测试。

Framing flu prevention--an experimental field test of signs promoting hand hygiene during the 2009-2010 H1N1 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2011 May;30(3):295-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023125.

DOI:10.1037/a0023125
PMID:21553973
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

During the 2009-2010 H1N1 flu pandemic, many institutions installed alcohol-based hand sanitizer dispensers in public settings in an effort to prevent the spread of the virus. Yet, usage of these dispensers remained low.

METHOD

Point-of-use reminder signs were designed to emphasize four theoretically grounded health beliefs: perceived susceptibility, social norms, consequences of the behavior framed as gains, and consequences of the behavior framed as losses. From October 2009 to March 2010, 58 sanitizer dispensers in public buildings were randomly assigned to have one of the four signs placed next to it, and dispenser usage was continually monitored.

RESULTS

All signs were associated with greater sanitizer usage compared to no sign. The gain-framed sign was associated with greatest usage (66% over no sign). Signs emphasizing susceptibility to H1N1 were associated with the lowest usage (41% over no sign). Although usage declined over time and closely mirrored trends in public interest about H1N1, the influence of the signs was not dependent on degree of public interest.

CONCLUSION

This experimental field study shows how simple, theoretically grounded signs can serve as cues to action in promoting the adoption of preventive behaviors. Gain-framed signage is particularly effective in promoting hand hygiene in a flu pandemic.

摘要

目的

在 2009-2010 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间,许多机构在公共场所安装了含酒精的洗手液分配器,以努力防止病毒传播。然而,这些分配器的使用率仍然很低。

方法

在 2009 年 10 月至 2010 年 3 月期间,在公共建筑中的 58 个洗手液分配器旁随机放置了四个基于理论的具有针对性的提醒标志,以强调四个理论基础的健康信念:感知易感性、社会规范、行为的收益后果和行为的损失后果。同时持续监测分配器的使用情况。

结果

与没有标志相比,所有标志都与更高的洗手液使用率相关。以收益为框架的标志与最高的使用率相关(比没有标志高 66%)。强调对 H1N1 易感性的标志与最低的使用率相关(比没有标志高 41%)。尽管使用率随着时间的推移而下降,并且与公众对 H1N1 的兴趣趋势密切相关,但标志的影响并不取决于公众兴趣的程度。

结论

这项实验性现场研究表明,简单的、基于理论的标志可以作为促进预防性行为采用的行动提示。以收益为框架的标志在流感大流行期间特别有效地促进手部卫生。

相似文献

1
Framing flu prevention--an experimental field test of signs promoting hand hygiene during the 2009-2010 H1N1 pandemic.宣传流感预防——2009-2010 年 H1N1 大流行期间通过宣传标志促进手部卫生的实验性现场测试。
Health Psychol. 2011 May;30(3):295-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023125.
2
Knowledge about pandemic flu among Italian health care workers (HCWs): an Italian survey.意大利医护人员对大流行性流感的认知:一项意大利调查。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2011 Sep;52(3):127-30.
3
Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine: an update.2009年甲型H1N1大流行性流感疫苗:最新情况
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):13-8. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.76517.
4
H1N1 pandemic influenza impact on hand hygiene and specific precautions compliance among healthcare workers.甲型H1N1流感大流行对医护人员手部卫生及特定预防措施依从性的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Oct;79(2):177-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Lessons learned: managing a pandemic in a multihospital system.经验教训:在多医院系统中应对大流行病
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2011 Jan-Mar;34(1):60-7. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3182048109.
6
Influenza vaccine--safe, effective, and mistrusted.流感疫苗——安全、有效,但却不受信任。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 2;363(23):2183-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1012333. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
[Evidence-based public health for pandemic flu].[大流行性流感的循证公共卫生]
Nihon Rinsho. 2010 Sep;68(9):1722-6.
8
[Novel influenza H1N1 pandemic: lesson learned].
Nihon Rinsho. 2010 Sep;68(9):1602-4.
9
Pandemic H1N1 2009 ('swine flu'): diagnostic and other challenges.大流行性 H1N1 2009(“猪流感”):诊断和其他挑战。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011 Jan;11(1):35-40. doi: 10.1586/erm.10.102.
10
Acceptance of a vaccine against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus amongst healthcare workers in Beijing, China.中国北京医护人员对甲型 H1N1 流感病毒疫苗的接受情况。
Vaccine. 2011 Feb 11;29(8):1605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.077. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of self-reported adherence to COVID-19 regulations in Spain: social norms, trust and risk perception.西班牙民众自我报告遵守 COVID-19 规定的决定因素:社会规范、信任和风险感知。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Dec 1;37(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac138.
2
Promoting a hand sanitizer by persuasive messages: moving bottle and background color as approach and avoidance cues.通过说服性信息推广洗手液:移动瓶子和背景颜色作为趋近和回避线索。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 15:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03632-8.
3
Different Behavior-Change Messaging Techniques Do Not Increase Customers' Hand Sanitization Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Natural Behavioral Study.
不同的行为改变信息传递技巧在新冠疫情期间并未提高顾客对手部消毒的依从性:一项自然行为研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;13:876131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876131. eCollection 2022.
4
Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.行为经济学方法在传染病应对中的应用:COVID-19 大流行中的预防、检测和疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0258828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258828. eCollection 2022.
5
What influences people's responses to public health messages for managing risks and preventing infectious diseases? A rapid systematic review of the evidence and recommendations.哪些因素影响人们对管理风险和预防传染病的公共卫生信息的反应?对证据和建议的快速系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048750.
6
"Did you wash your hands?": a prospective study of patient empowerment to prompt hand washing by healthcare providers.“你洗手了吗?”:一项关于患者赋权促使医护人员洗手的前瞻性研究。
J Infect Prev. 2021 Sep;22(5):195-202. doi: 10.1177/17571774211012767. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Development of a Haddon Matrix Framework for Higher Education Pandemic Preparedness: Scoping Review and Experiences of Malaysian Universities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.用于高等教育大流行防范的哈顿矩阵框架的开发:COVID-19大流行期间马来西亚大学的范围审查和经验
High Educ Policy. 2022;35(2):439-478. doi: 10.1057/s41307-020-00221-x. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Descriptive Norms and Prototypes Predict COVID-19 Prevention Cognitions and Behaviors in the United States: Applying the Prototype Willingness Model to Pandemic Mitigation.描述性规范和原型可预测美国 COVID-19 预防认知和行为:将原型意愿模型应用于大流行缓解。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 27;55(11):1089-1103. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab075.
9
Interventions to increase personal protective behaviours to limit the spread of respiratory viruses: A rapid evidence review and meta-analysis.干预措施以增加个人防护行为来限制呼吸道病毒的传播:快速证据综述和荟萃分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):215-264. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12542. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
10
Social media use as a predictor of handwashing during a pandemic: evidence from COVID-19 in Malaysia.社交媒体使用在大流行期间预测洗手行为:来自马来西亚 COVID-19 的证据。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Oct 23;148:e261. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002575.