• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用问题-行为效应促进疾病预防行为:两项随机对照试验。

Using the question-behavior effect to promote disease prevention behaviors: two randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2011 May;30(3):300-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023036.

DOI:10.1037/a0023036
PMID:21553974
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of interventions based on the question-behavior effect in promoting the adoption of disease prevention behaviors.

DESIGN

In Study 1, adults from the general public were randomly allocated to complete a questionnaire about health checks (question-behavior effect condition) or not (control) and later received an invitation to attend for screening. In Study 2, health care professionals were randomly allocated to complete a questionnaire about influenza vaccination or not and later had the opportunity to receive a vaccination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We objectively assessed health check attendance (Study 1) and influenza vaccination (Study 2).

RESULTS

In Study 1, intention-to-treat analyses indicated that health check attendance was significantly higher in the question-behavior effect condition (68.3%) compared with the control condition (53.5%). In Study 2, intention-to-treat analyses indicated that influenza vaccination was significantly higher among participants in the question-behavior effect condition (42.0%) compared with the control condition (36.3%), and this effect persisted after controlling for demographic variables. Explanatory analyses indicated that the effects in both studies were attributable to completing rather than merely receiving the questionnaire and were stronger for those with positive attitudes or intentions about the target behavior.

CONCLUSION

The question-behavior effect represents a simple, cost-effective means to increase disease prevention behaviors among the general public and health professionals. Implications for promoting health behaviors are discussed.

摘要

目的

检验基于问题行为效应的干预措施在促进预防疾病行为采用方面的效果。

设计

在研究 1 中,从普通公众中随机分配成年人完成关于健康检查的问卷(问题行为效应条件)或不完成(对照),然后收到参加筛查的邀请。在研究 2 中,随机分配医疗保健专业人员完成关于流感疫苗接种的问卷或不完成,然后有机会接种疫苗。

主要观察指标

我们客观评估了健康检查的参与度(研究 1)和流感疫苗接种(研究 2)。

结果

在研究 1 中,意向治疗分析表明,问题行为效应条件下健康检查的参与率显著高于对照条件(53.5%)(68.3%)。在研究 2 中,意向治疗分析表明,问题行为效应条件下的流感疫苗接种率显著高于对照条件(36.3%)(42.0%),并且在控制了人口统计学变量后,这种效应仍然存在。解释性分析表明,这两项研究中的效应归因于完成问卷而不仅仅是收到问卷,并且对于那些对目标行为持积极态度或意图的人来说,效应更强。

结论

问题行为效应代表了一种简单、具有成本效益的方法,可以提高普通公众和卫生专业人员的预防疾病行为。讨论了促进健康行为的意义。

相似文献

1
Using the question-behavior effect to promote disease prevention behaviors: two randomized controlled trials.利用问题-行为效应促进疾病预防行为:两项随机对照试验。
Health Psychol. 2011 May;30(3):300-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023036.
2
Influenza vaccines: the key to disease prevention and control.流感疫苗:疾病预防与控制的关键。
Pediatr Ann. 2009 Dec;38(12):650-4. doi: 10.3928/00904481-20091117-04.
3
Health behaviors and health promotion/disease prevention perceptions of medical students.医学生的健康行为以及对健康促进/疾病预防的认知
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;12(1):38-43.
4
Proceedings of the 1991 International Symposium on Data on Aging. Health promotion and disease prevention workshop.1991年国际老龄数据研讨会会议记录。健康促进与疾病预防研讨会
Vital Health Stat 5. 1993 Aug(7):51-3.
5
Health promotion and disease prevention among nurses working in local public health organizations in Montréal, Québec.魁北克省蒙特利尔市地方公共卫生组织护士的健康促进和疾病预防。
Public Health Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;27(5):450-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00878.x.
6
Part I: Basic approach to health screening.第一部分:健康筛查的基本方法。
N J Med. 1991 Jun;88(6):421-6.
7
Preventive geriatrics: basic principles for primary care physicians.预防性老年医学:基层医疗医生的基本原则
Geriatrics. 1992 Jul;47(7):39-50.
8
Is preventive medical care worth the cost?预防性医疗保健值得花费这些成本吗?
Biologicals. 1997 Jun;25(2):247-52. doi: 10.1006/biol.1997.0094.
9
Causal relationship between health promoting behavior and quality of life in cervical cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.接受放疗的宫颈癌患者健康促进行为与生活质量之间的因果关系。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005 Nov;36(6):1568-75.
10
Strategies for maintenance of health-promoting behaviors.维持健康促进行为的策略。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;28(2):427-42.

引用本文的文献

1
The mere-measurement effect of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.患者报告结局的单纯测量效应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1211-1220. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03909-y. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Key Considerations for Designing Clinical Studies to Evaluate Digital Health Solutions.设计临床研究评估数字健康解决方案的关键考虑因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 17;26:e54518. doi: 10.2196/54518.
3
Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接种疫苗行为干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Policy. 2023 Nov;137:104894. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Activation Versus Change as a Principle Underlying Intervention Strategies to Promote Health Behaviors.激活与改变:作为促进健康行为干预策略的基础原则。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Apr 5;57(3):205-215. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac045.
5
How I See Me-A Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association Between Identities and Pro-environmental Behaviour.我眼中的自己——一项调查身份认同与亲环境行为之间关联的荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:582421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582421. eCollection 2021.
6
Do sociodemographic variables and cardiometabolic risk factors moderate the mere-measurement effect on physical activity and sedentary time?社会人口学变量和心血管代谢风险因素是否会调节单纯测量对身体活动和久坐时间的影响?
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01551-9.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.行为干预提高重症监护试验入组率的随机对照试验
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1117-1125. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-194OC.
8
Effect of a tailored leaflet to promote diabetic retinopathy screening among young adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.一份定制传单对促进2型糖尿病青年成人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-1311-y.
9
A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake: invitation methods, patient characteristics, and the impact of interventions.系统评价影响国民保健服务健康检查参与的因素:邀请方法、患者特征以及干预措施的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7889-4.
10
The impact of in hospital patient-education intervention on older people's attitudes and intention to have their benzodiazepines deprescribed: a feasibility study.住院患者教育干预对老年人停用苯二氮䓬类药物的态度和意愿的影响:一项可行性研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jan 17;10:2042098618816562. doi: 10.1177/2042098618816562. eCollection 2019.