ARC-Animal Production Institute, Irene, South Africa.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2011 Jun;128(3):209-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00891.x. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
In this study, we compare the level and distribution of genetic variation between South African conserved and village chicken populations using microsatellite markers. In addition, diversity in South African chickens was compared to that of a reference data set consisting of other African and purebred commercial lines. Three chicken populations Venda, Ovambo and Eastern Cape and four conserved flocks of the Venda, Ovambo, Naked Neck and Potchefstroom Koekoek from the Poultry Breeding Resource Unit of the Agricultural Research Council were genotyped at 29 autosomal microsatellite loci. All markers were polymorphic. Village chicken populations were more diverse than conservation flocks. structure software was used to cluster individuals to a predefined number of 2 ≤ K ≤ 6 clusters. The most probable clustering was found at K = 5 (95% identical runs). At this level of differentiation, the four conservation flocks separated as four independent clusters, while the three village chicken populations together formed another cluster. Thus, cluster analysis indicated a clear subdivision of each of the conservation flocks that were different from the three village chicken populations. The contribution of each South African chicken populations to the total diversity of the chickens studied was determined by calculating the optimal core set contributions based on Marker estimated kinship. Safe set analysis was carried out using bootstrapped kinship values calculated to relate the added genetic diversity of seven South African chicken populations to a set of reference populations consisting of other African and purebred commercial broiler and layer chickens. In both core set and the safe set analyses, village chicken populations scored slightly higher to the reference set compared to conservation flocks. Overall, the present study demonstrated that the conservation flocks of South African chickens displayed considerable genetic variability that is different from that of the assumed founder populations (village chickens).
在这项研究中,我们使用微卫星标记比较了南非保护种群和乡村鸡种群之间遗传变异的水平和分布。此外,还将南非鸡的多样性与由其他非洲和纯商业肉鸡和蛋鸡组成的参考数据集进行了比较。三个鸡种群——文达、奥万博和东开普,以及农业研究理事会家禽养殖资源单位的四个保护种群——文达、奥万博、裸体颈和波切夫斯特鲁姆·科埃科克,在 29 个常染色体微卫星位点上进行了基因分型。所有标记都是多态的。乡村鸡种群比保护种群更具多样性。结构软件用于将个体聚类到预定义的 2 ≤ K ≤ 6 个聚类数。最可能的聚类是在 K = 5 时发现的(95%相同运行)。在这种分化水平上,四个保护种群分离为四个独立的聚类,而三个乡村鸡种群共同形成另一个聚类。因此,聚类分析表明,每个保护种群都明显分为与三个乡村鸡种群不同的群体。通过计算基于标记估计亲缘关系的最优核心集贡献,确定了每个南非鸡种群对所研究鸡的总多样性的贡献。使用bootstrap 亲缘关系值进行安全集分析,以将七个南非鸡种群的遗传多样性增加与由其他非洲和纯商业肉鸡和蛋鸡组成的参考种群相关联。在核心集和安全集分析中,乡村鸡种群的得分略高于参考集,而保护种群的得分则略低于参考集。总的来说,本研究表明,南非鸡的保护种群显示出相当大的遗传变异性,与假设的创始种群(乡村鸡)不同。