Cancer Center Munich South, Klinikum Neuperlach and Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Mycoses. 2011 Sep;54(5):e546-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01988.x. Epub 2011 May 10.
The objectives of this study were to identify unsolved issues in the management of invasive candidiasis, identify controversies and achieve consensus. The German Speaking Mycological Society (Deutschsprachige Mykologische Gesellschaft, DMykG e.V.) asked other German infectious diseases (ID) and mycological societies to submit unsolved issues concerning the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections. Based on these contributions, a digital web-based questionnaire of 12 questions on Candida infections was designed to be completed by experts of the participating societies. Controversial results were identified by a mathematical model and were discussed at a consensus conference during the 43rd Annual Meeting of the DMykG e.V. in Cologne, Germany. Forty-two individuals completed the questionnaire. Analysis showed a strong consensus on treatment indications, choice of antifungals for clinical situations, handling of central venous catheters, duration of treatment and role of susceptibility testing. Opinions diverged on: initial treatment of haemodynamically stable neutropenic and haemodynamically unstable non-neutropenic patients, step down to oral treatment and the differential role of the echinocandins. These questions were presented for discussion at the expert consensus conference. In three of four questions, consensus was achieved. A two-step approach - web-based survey plus classical panel discussion - allows to capture expeditiously the opinions of a large and diverse group of individuals, to identify controversial issues and to resolve them in a personal, interactive setting. Thus, expert consensus was achieved on nine of 12 important questions on how to treat invasive candidiasis.
本研究旨在确定侵袭性念珠菌病管理中尚未解决的问题,识别争议并达成共识。德国真菌学会(Deutschsprachige Mykologische Gesellschaft,DMykG e.V.)要求其他德国传染病(ID)和真菌学会提交有关真菌感染诊断和治疗的未解决问题。基于这些贡献,针对念珠菌感染设计了一个包含 12 个问题的数字化网络问卷调查,由参与学会的专家完成。通过数学模型识别有争议的结果,并在德国科隆举行的第 43 届 DMykG e.V.年会上的共识会议上进行讨论。42 人完成了问卷调查。分析表明,在治疗指征、针对临床情况的抗真菌药物选择、中心静脉导管处理、治疗持续时间和药敏试验作用方面存在强烈共识。在以下方面存在分歧:血流动力学稳定的中性粒细胞减少症和血流动力学不稳定的非中性粒细胞减少症患者的初始治疗、降阶梯至口服治疗以及棘白菌素的差异作用。这些问题在专家共识会议上进行了讨论。在四个问题中的三个问题上达成了共识。两步法 - 网络调查加经典小组讨论 - 可以迅速捕捉到大量和多样化的个人意见,识别有争议的问题,并在个人互动的环境中解决这些问题。因此,在如何治疗侵袭性念珠菌病的 12 个重要问题中的 9 个问题上达成了专家共识。