Suppr超能文献

每周紫杉醇单药治疗或联合卡铂或拓扑替康治疗耐药性卵巢癌患者:来自 Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens(GINECO)的 CARTAXHY 随机 II 期试验。

Weekly paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with carboplatin or weekly topotecan in patients with resistant ovarian cancer: the CARTAXHY randomized phase II trial from Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO).

机构信息

Oncology Department, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2012 Feb;23(2):346-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr149. Epub 2011 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platinum rechallenge or weekly topotecan in combination have not been evaluated in randomized trials for resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).

METHODS

Patients with ROC after first- or second-line treatment including a platinum and taxane and progression within 6 months were randomized to weekly paclitaxel (wP, 80 mg/m(2)/week) alone or in combination with carboplatin (C, area under the curve of 5 mg/ml/min every 4 weeks) or weekly topotecan (wT, 3 mg/m(2)/week). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) comparing wP and combination therapy.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 165) received a median three cycles in each arm. Nonhematologic toxicity was not different, except increased hypersensitivity reactions with wP + C. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxic effects with wP, wP + C, and wP + wT, respectively, were neutropenia in 13%, 54%, and 42%; febrile neutropenia in 0%, 4%, and 5%; and anemia in 6%, 19%, and 29%. Response rates were 35%, 37%, and 39%, and median PFS times were 3.7, 4.8, and 5.4 months, respectively. PFS was not significantly different among the treatment arms [hazard ratio (HR) 0.922; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.765-1.111; P = 0.46] or between monotherapy and combination therapy (HR 0.951; 95% CI 0.686-1.318; P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ROC was more toxic than weekly paclitaxel and did not significantly prolong PFS.

摘要

背景

铂类药物再挑战或每周拓扑替康联合治疗在抵抗复发性卵巢癌(ROC)的随机试验中尚未得到评估。

方法

一线或二线治疗(包括铂类和紫杉烷)后出现 ROC 且在 6 个月内进展的患者,按随机分组接受每周紫杉醇(wP,80mg/m²/周)单药或联合卡铂(C,每 4 周一次,曲线下面积为 5mg/ml/min)或每周拓扑替康(wT,3mg/m²/周)治疗。主要终点为比较 wP 和联合治疗的无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

每组患者(n=165)中位接受了三周期治疗。非血液学毒性无差异,wP+C 组过敏反应增加。wP、wP+C 和 wP+wT 组的 3-4 级血液学毒性效应分别为中性粒细胞减少症 13%、54%和 42%;发热性中性粒细胞减少症 0%、4%和 5%;贫血症 6%、19%和 29%。缓解率分别为 35%、37%和 39%,中位 PFS 时间分别为 3.7、4.8 和 5.4 个月。各治疗组之间 PFS 无显著差异[风险比(HR)0.922;95%置信区间(CI)0.765-1.111;P=0.46]或单药与联合治疗之间(HR 0.951;95% CI 0.686-1.318;P=0.76)。

结论

铂类耐药 ROC 的联合化疗比每周紫杉醇更具毒性,且并未显著延长 PFS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验