Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):851-5. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0796-5. Epub 2011 May 12.
A variety of surgical strategies have been suggested and many surgical techniques, both abdominal and perineal, have been introduced for treatment of rectal prolapse. All these techniques and approaches are based on the attempt to restore the normal anatomy and physiologic function.
In 1992, Berman et al. published the first laparoscopically performed rectopexy. Meanwhile, many different minimally invasive procedures have been described. Throughout the past century, more than 100 different surgical techniques have been introduced to treat patients with rectal prolapse. Unfortunately, there is still lack of one generally accepted standard technique for the surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.
Our current data strongly supports laparoscopic resection rectopexy to be a safe, fast, and very effective procedure to improve function in patients with rectal prolapse. More evaluations of long-term outcome are needed that focus on each particular laparoscopic procedure to adequately compare different techniques. The indication to perform a laparoscopic resection rectopexy in patients with a previous perineal procedure and a recurrent prolapse should be stated critically because these patients seem to have a high risk to develop yet another recurrence.
针对直肠脱垂,已经提出了多种手术策略,并且引入了许多腹部和会阴的手术技术。所有这些技术和方法都基于恢复正常解剖结构和生理功能的尝试。
1992 年,Berman 等人发表了首例腹腔镜直肠固定术。同时,也描述了许多不同的微创方法。在过去的一个世纪里,已经引入了 100 多种不同的手术技术来治疗直肠脱垂患者。不幸的是,对于直肠脱垂的手术治疗,仍然缺乏一种普遍接受的标准技术。
我们目前的数据强烈支持腹腔镜直肠切除术固定术是一种安全、快速且非常有效的治疗方法,可以改善直肠脱垂患者的功能。需要更多的长期结果评估,重点关注每个特定的腹腔镜手术,以充分比较不同的技术。对于先前会阴手术和复发脱垂的患者,行腹腔镜直肠切除术的适应证应严格评估,因为这些患者似乎有很高的复发风险。