USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Burns, Oregon 97220, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2011 Mar;21(2):490-502. doi: 10.1890/10-0280.1.
Theoretical and empirical work has established a positive relationship between resource availability and habitat invasibility. For nonnative invasive annual grasses, similar to other invasive species, invader success has been tied most often to increased nitrogen (N) availability. These observations have led to the logical assumption that managing soils for low N availability will facilitate restoration of invasive plant-dominated systems. Although invasive annual grasses pose a serious threat to a number of perennial-dominated ecosystems worldwide, there has been no quantitative synthesis evaluating the degree to which soil N management may facilitate restoration efforts. We used meta-analysis to evaluate the degree to which soil N management impacts growth and competitive ability of annual and perennial grass seedlings. We then link our analysis to current theories of plant ecological strategies and community assembly to improve our ability to understand how soil N management may be used to restore annual grass-dominated communities. Across studies, annual grasses maintained higher growth rates and greater biomass and tiller production than perennials under low and high N availability. We found no evidence that lowering N availability fundamentally alters competitive interactions between annual and perennial grass seedlings. Competitive effects of annual neighbors on perennial targets were similar under low and high N availability. Moreover, in most cases perennials grown under competition in high-N soils produced more biomass than perennials grown under competition in low-N soils. While these findings counter current restoration and soil N management assumptions, these results are consistent with current plant ecological strategy and community assembly theory. Based on our results and these theories we argue that, in restoration scenarios in which the native plant community is being reassembled from seed, soil N management will have no direct positive effect on native plant establishment unless invasive plant propagule pools and priority effects are controlled the first growing season.
理论和实证研究已经确立了资源可利用性与栖息地可入侵性之间的正相关关系。对于非本地入侵性一年生草本植物,与其他入侵物种相似,入侵成功通常与增加氮 (N) 可利用性有关。这些观察结果导致了一个合乎逻辑的假设,即管理低 N 可利用性的土壤将有助于恢复被入侵植物主导的系统。虽然入侵性一年生草本植物对全球许多以多年生植物为主的生态系统构成了严重威胁,但尚未有定量综合评估土壤 N 管理在多大程度上可能促进恢复工作。我们使用元分析来评估土壤 N 管理对一年生和多年生草本植物幼苗生长和竞争力的影响程度。然后,我们将我们的分析与当前的植物生态策略和群落组装理论联系起来,以提高我们理解如何利用土壤 N 管理来恢复一年生草本植物主导的群落的能力。在研究中,一年生草本植物在低氮和高氮供应下比多年生草本植物保持更高的生长率和更大的生物量和分蘖产量。我们没有发现证据表明降低 N 可利用性从根本上改变了一年生和多年生草本植物幼苗之间的竞争相互作用。一年生植物对多年生目标的竞争效应在低氮和高氮供应下相似。此外,在大多数情况下,在高氮土壤中竞争生长的多年生植物产生的生物量多于在低氮土壤中竞争生长的多年生植物。虽然这些发现与当前的恢复和土壤 N 管理假设相矛盾,但这些结果与当前的植物生态策略和群落组装理论一致。基于我们的结果和这些理论,我们认为,在从种子重新组装本地植物群落的恢复情景中,除非在第一个生长季节控制入侵植物繁殖体池和优先效应,否则土壤 N 管理将不会对本地植物的建立产生直接的积极影响。