Department of Urological Oncology, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Postgrad Med. 2011 May;123(3):35-42. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.05.2282.
With the widespread use of computed tomography imaging, the majority of renal tumors are currently detected incidentally at lower grade and stage. Partial nephrectomy has become the preferred treatment for many of these smaller, lower-stage, organ-confined tumors. Compared with radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy is more technically difficult to perform. Specific tumor features such as tumor size, depth, location, and proximity to the kidney vasculature and urinary collecting system affect the difficulty of resection. Classically, feasibility of resection has been determined subjectively. Recently, 3 methodologies have been proposed to provide standard, more objective preoperative assessment of tumor anatomy. These "nephrometry" systems include the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and C-index systems. In this article, we review aspects of each of these systems, their similarities and differences, and their relevance to clinical practice and academic reporting.
随着计算机断层扫描成像的广泛应用,目前大多数肾肿瘤在较低级别和分期时被偶然发现。对于许多较小的、较低分期的、器官局限的肿瘤,部分肾切除术已成为首选治疗方法。与根治性肾切除术相比,部分肾切除术的操作难度更大。肿瘤的大小、深度、位置以及与肾脏血管和尿路系统的接近程度等特定肿瘤特征会影响切除的难度。传统上,切除的可行性是主观确定的。最近,提出了 3 种方法来提供肿瘤解剖结构的标准、更客观的术前评估。这些“肾肿瘤测量”系统包括 R.E.N.A.L.、PADUA 和 C-index 系统。本文综述了这些系统的各个方面,包括它们的相似点和不同点,以及它们与临床实践和学术报告的相关性。