Suppr超能文献

慢性阿片类药物和环氧化酶-2 使用者与一般人群队列相比的冠心病结局。

Coronary heart disease outcomes among chronic opioid and cyclooxygenase-2 users compared with a general population cohort.

机构信息

i3 Drug Safety, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):754-62. doi: 10.1002/pds.2131. Epub 2011 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We estimated the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) among users of chronic opioid therapy (COT) and compared risks across categories of morphine-equivalent doses of COT and comparator cohorts.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective claims-based study using de-identified data from a commercially insured population. A cohort of 148,657 adult users of COT, a matched cohort of the general population, and three cohorts of users of chronic cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor therapy totaling 122,810 were identified. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of MI and MI/CR were estimated.

RESULTS

Adjusted IRRs for MI ranged from 1.21 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.02-1.45) among those receiving low COT doses to 1.89 (95%CI, 1.54-2.33) among those receiving high doses compared with those receiving very low doses, averaging <15 mg/day. Similar patterns were shown for MI/CR. IRRs standardized to the age-sex distribution of the general cohort and adjusted for coronary heart disease risk factors showed 2.7 times the rate of MI and 2.4 times the rate of MI/CR in the COT cohort compared with the general population. Using the same analysis, COX-2 users had 1.7-1.9 times the rate of MI and MI/CR compared with the general cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic analgesic use with either COT or COX-2 was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes. These findings suggest either a selection of high-risk patients to chronic analgesic treatment, coupled with unmeasured or residual confounding, or a potential cardiovascular effect of these medications. Further research is warranted to evaluate causes for this association.

摘要

背景

我们评估了慢性阿片类药物治疗(COT)使用者中心肌梗死(MI)和冠状动脉血运重建(CR)的发生率,并比较了 COT 吗啡等效剂量类别和对照队列之间的风险。

方法

我们使用商业保险人群的匿名数据开展了一项回顾性基于索赔的研究。确定了 148657 名成年 COT 使用者队列、一般人群的匹配队列以及总共 122810 名慢性环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂治疗使用者的三个队列。估计了 MI 和 MI/CR 的发生率和发生率比(IRR)。

结果

与接受低剂量 COT 的患者相比,接受高剂量 COT 的患者(1.21 [95%置信区间[95%CI],1.02-1.45))和接受高剂量 COT 的患者(1.89 [95%CI],1.54-2.33)))发生 MI 的调整后 IRR 范围从接受极低剂量 COT 的患者(1.02-1.45)))))))。MI/CR 也呈现出类似的模式。与一般队列的年龄性别分布标准化并调整冠心病危险因素后,COT 队列的 MI 和 MI/CR 发生率分别是一般人群的 2.7 倍和 2.4 倍。使用相同的分析,COX-2 使用者的 MI 和 MI/CR 发生率比一般队列高 1.7-1.9 倍。

结论

无论是使用 COT 还是 COX-2 进行慢性镇痛治疗,均与心血管结局风险增加相关。这些发现表明,要么是对慢性镇痛治疗选择了高危患者,要么是存在未测量或残余混杂因素,要么是这些药物具有潜在的心血管作用。需要进一步研究来评估这种关联的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验