• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病模型评分可预测妊娠期间肝硬化患者的结局。

Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts outcome in cirrhotic patients during pregnancy.

机构信息

Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):694-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.036. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.036
PMID:21570482
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pregnancy is rare among patients with cirrhosis, and data about complications and outcomes are sparse. We evaluated the utility of prognostic models of severity of cirrhosis in determining outcomes in pregnant women with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We evaluated all cirrhotic patients who self-reported pregnancy at our center and correlated prognostic scores at the time of conception with outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-two pregnancies occurred in 29 women. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at conception was 7 (range, 6-17), the median MELD sodium score was 9 (range, 6-17), the median United Kingdom end-stage liver disease (UKELD) score was 44 (range, 36-53), and the median Child-Pugh score was 5 (range, 5-8). The live birth rate was 58%; the median gestational age was 36 weeks. Higher MELD (P = .01), MELD sodium (P = .01), UKELD (P = .01), and Child-Pugh (P = .03) scores were associated with gestation <37 weeks. Maternal complications (ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal hemorrhage) occurred in 10% of patients and were associated with higher MELD (P = .01) and UKELD (P = .02) scores. Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated that a MELD score ≥10 predicted, with 83% sensitivity and 83% specificity, which patients were likely to have significant, liver-related complications (area under curve, 0.8); a UKELD score ≥47 had 83% sensitivity and 79% specificity (area under curve, 0.8). No patient who had a MELD score ≤6 or a UKELD score ≤42 developed any significant hepatologic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MELD and UKELD scores at the time of conception can be used to predict specific clinical outcomes in pregnant women with cirrhosis.

摘要

背景与目的

肝硬化患者妊娠罕见,相关并发症和结局的数据稀少。我们评估了几种肝硬化严重程度预测模型在预测肝硬化孕妇结局方面的作用。

方法

我们评估了在本中心自我报告妊娠的所有肝硬化患者,并将受孕时的预测评分与结局相关联。

结果

29 名女性共发生 62 例妊娠。受孕时中位终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分 7 分(范围 6-17 分),中位 MELD 钠评分 9 分(范围 6-17 分),中位英国终末期肝病评分(UKELD)44 分(范围 36-53 分),中位 Child-Pugh 评分为 5 分(范围 5-8 分)。活产率为 58%;中位妊娠周数为 36 周。较高的 MELD(P =.01)、MELD 钠(P =.01)、UKELD(P =.01)和 Child-Pugh(P =.03)评分与妊娠<37 周有关。10%的患者出现了母体并发症(腹水、肝性脑病或静脉曲张出血),且与较高的 MELD(P =.01)和 UKELD(P =.02)评分相关。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,MELD 评分≥10 预测患者可能发生显著的肝脏相关并发症的灵敏度为 83%,特异性为 83%(曲线下面积,0.8);UKELD 评分≥47 的灵敏度为 83%,特异性为 79%(曲线下面积,0.8)。MELD 评分≤6 或 UKELD 评分≤42 的患者无一例发生任何显著的肝脏并发症。

结论

受孕时的 MELD 和 UKELD 评分可用于预测肝硬化孕妇的特定临床结局。

相似文献

1
Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts outcome in cirrhotic patients during pregnancy.终末期肝病模型评分可预测妊娠期间肝硬化患者的结局。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):694-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.036. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
2
A revised scope in different prognostic models in cirrhotic patients: Current and future perspectives, an Egyptian experience.肝硬化患者不同预后模型的修订范围:当前与未来展望,埃及的经验
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;14(4):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
3
The Refit model for end-stage liver disease-Na is not a better predictor of mortality than the Refit model for end-stage liver disease in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.终末期肝病钠模型(Refit model for end-stage liver disease-Na)并不优于终末期肝病模型(Refit model for end-stage liver disease)预测肝硬化伴腹水患者的死亡率。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;20(1):47-55. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.1.47. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
4
Validation of model for end-stage liver disease score to serum sodium ratio index as a prognostic predictor in patients with cirrhosis.终末期肝病评分与血清钠比值指数模型作为肝硬化患者预后预测指标的验证
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1547-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05913.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
5
The model for the end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh score in predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal variceal bleeding.终末期肝病模型及Child-Pugh评分在预测肝硬化合并食管静脉曲张出血患者预后中的应用
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2009 Sep;66(9):724-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp0909724b.
6
MELD-Na: effective in predicting rebleeding in cirrhosis after cessation of esophageal variceal hemorrhage by endoscopic therapy.终末期肝病模型-钠评分(MELD-Na):在内镜治疗后食管静脉曲张出血停止的肝硬化患者中,对预测再出血有效。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):870-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000043.
7
Early Liver Failure after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients with Cirrhosis with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score of 12 or Less: Incidence, Outcome, and Prognostic Factors.肝硬化患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后早期肝衰竭:发生率、结局和预后因素,模型终末期肝病评分(MELD)为 12 分或以下。
Radiology. 2016 Aug;280(2):622-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151625. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
8
A combination of models for end-stage liver disease and cirrhosis-related complications to predict the prognosis of liver cirrhosis.终末期肝病模型和肝硬化相关并发症模型联合预测肝硬化预后。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;36(6):583-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
9
MELD scores with incorporation of serum sodium and death prediction in cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation: a single center experience in southern Brazil.MELD 评分结合血清钠和死亡预测在巴西南部等待肝移植的肝硬化患者中的应用:单中心经验。
Clin Transplant. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):E395-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01688.x.
10
Ability of King's College Criteria and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores to Predict Mortality of Patients With Acute Liver Failure: A Meta-analysis.国王学院标准及终末期肝病模型评分预测急性肝衰竭患者死亡率的能力:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):516-525.e5; quiz e43-e45. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
FIGO guideline on liver disease and pregnancy.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)关于肝病与妊娠的指南。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):28-48. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70161. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
A systematic review of noninvasive laboratory indices and elastography to predict hepatic decompensation.一项关于预测肝失代偿的非侵入性实验室指标和弹性成像的系统评价。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Mar 24;9(4). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000675. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
3
Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Liver Cirrhosis: A National Prospective Cohort Study Using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System.
肝硬化女性的妊娠结局:一项使用英国产科监测系统的全国前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2025 Jun;132(7):935-943. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18107. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Major surgical conditions of childhood and their lifelong implications: comprehensive review.儿童时期的主要外科病症及其终身影响:综合综述。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae028.
5
Outcomes of liver diseases in pregnant females: A study from a tertiary care medical center in Pakistan.妊娠女性肝病的结局:来自巴基斯坦一家三级医疗中心的研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(3Part-II):284-290. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.3.7670.
6
Hepatitis-C during Pregnancy: Antenatal period challenges, management and the way forward.妊娠期丙型肝炎:产前阶段的挑战、管理及未来方向
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):227-232. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7578.
7
Factors and a model to predict three-month mortality in patients with acute fatty liver of pregnancy from two medical centers.预测两家医学中心妊娠急性脂肪肝患者三个月死亡率的因素和模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06233-w.
8
Cirrhosis in pregnancy.妊娠期肝硬化
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2023 Oct 17;22(5):167-170. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000087. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
British Society of Gastroenterology Best Practice Guidance: outpatient management of cirrhosis - part 3: special circumstances.英国胃肠病学会最佳实践指南:肝硬化的门诊管理 - 第3部分:特殊情况
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 28;14(6):474-482. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102432. eCollection 2023.
10
A case report of a pregnant woman with compensated liver cirrhosis and pancytopenia.一名患有代偿期肝硬化和全血细胞减少症的孕妇的病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Jun 13;11(6):e7500. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7500. eCollection 2023 Jun.