• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在护理教育中使用分析纲要作为评估工具:积极与消极。

Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: the positive and the negative.

机构信息

Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Salem VA, 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, VA 24153, USA.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Apr;32(3):246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007
PMID:21571406
Abstract

It is imperative for nurse educators to provide accurate student evaluations to prepare them for the workplace. The impetus for transformation in nursing education has created the need for educators to effectively evaluate the quality of student achievement and learning through the educational process. Therefore, a rubric that consistently assesses student performance and provides meaningful feedback is essential in today's learning environment. If students are not given feedback that is consistent or meaningful, then they may feel their grades are not valid, thus sending mixed messages to the student. If expectations are not clear, the unacceptable performance may transfer into the work environment.

摘要

护士教育工作者必须提供准确的学生评估结果,为学生做好工作准备。护理教育改革的动力要求教育工作者通过教育过程,有效地评估学生成绩和学习质量。因此,在当今的学习环境中,需要使用能够持续评估学生表现并提供有意义反馈的评分标准。如果学生没有得到一致或有意义的反馈,他们可能会觉得自己的成绩无效,从而向学生传达出矛盾的信息。如果期望不明确,不可接受的表现可能会转移到工作环境中。

相似文献

1
Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: the positive and the negative.在护理教育中使用分析纲要作为评估工具:积极与消极。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Apr;32(3):246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 14.
2
Development and psychometric testing of the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument.团队学习学生评估工具的开发与心理计量学测试。
Nurse Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):168-72. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31825a87cc.
3
Rubrics 101: a primer for rubric development in dental education.评分标准 101:牙科教育中评分标准制定的入门指南。
J Dent Educ. 2011 Sep;75(9):1163-75.
4
Use of collaborative testing to promote nursing student success.运用协作测试促进护理专业学生取得成功。
Nurse Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):4-5. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000437366.96218.f1.
5
Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students.对副学士学位和学士学位护理专业学生使用克拉克模拟评估量表。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):101-5.
6
Guidelines for identifying and revising culturally biased multiple-choice nursing examination items.识别和修订具有文化偏见的多选题护理考试项目的指南。
Nurse Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;36(6):266-70. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182333fd2.
7
Critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students at program entry and exit.本科护理专业学生入学和毕业时的批判性思维能力。
Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):248-52.
8
Taking the 'sting' out of examination reviews: a student-centered approach.消除考试复习的“刺痛感”:以学生为中心的方法。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Jul 1;53(7):428. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140619-13.
9
Implications of multiple-choice testing in nursing education.护理教育中多项选择测试的意义。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Aug;32(6):e40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
Making portfolios work in practice.让投资组合在实际中发挥作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jun;46(6):595-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03050.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the agreement between teachers and students in the assessment of preclinical endodontics using a rubric.使用评分标准评估临床前牙髓病学时影响师生间一致性的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07193-9.
2
Building consensus on critical thinking assessment tool for undergraduate nursing students in a socialist low-middle income country: A delphi study.在一个社会主义中低收入国家就本科护理专业学生批判性思维评估工具达成共识:德尔菲研究
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15086. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15086. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Competence assessment rubric in the Physiotherapy Practicum.
物理治疗实习中的能力评估量表。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264120. eCollection 2022.
4
Correlations Between Clinical Judgement and Learning Style Preferences of Nursing Students in the Simulation Room.模拟病房中护生临床判断与学习风格偏好的相关性
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 28;8(6):1-13. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p1.
5
Factors affecting the communication competence in Iranian nursing students: a qualitative study.影响伊朗护理专业学生沟通能力的因素:一项定性研究。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Mar 31;17(3):e19660. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19660. eCollection 2015 Mar.