• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dynamic and static assessment of phonological awareness in preschool: a behavior-genetic study.学前儿童语音意识的动态与静态评估:一项行为遗传学研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):322-9. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407862. Epub 2011 May 12.
2
The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children.运用语音意识动态筛查预测幼儿园儿童阅读障碍风险。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):330-8. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407863. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
The structure of genetic influences on general cognitive, language, phonological, and reading abilities.遗传因素对一般认知、语言、语音和阅读能力的影响结构。
Dev Psychol. 1999 Mar;35(2):590-603. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.2.590.
4
Comparing two forms of dynamic assessment and traditional assessment of preschool phonological awareness.比较两种形式的动态评估和传统的学前语音意识评估。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):313-21. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407861. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Test of Preschool Early Literacy-Phonological Awareness Test Among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children and Hearing Children.聋儿和听力正常儿童学前早期读写能力-语音意识测验的因子有效性和测量不变性。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):278-292. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000485.
6
Does a Dynamic Test of Phonological Awareness Predict Early Reading Difficulties?语音意识动态测试能否预测早期阅读困难?
J Learn Disabil. 2017 May/Jun;50(3):227-237. doi: 10.1177/0022219415609185. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
7
Early language development and kindergarten phonological awareness as predictors of reading problems: from 3 to 11 years of age.早期语言发展和幼儿园语音意识作为阅读问题的预测指标:从3岁到11岁
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Sep-Oct;32(5):464-72. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200512.
8
Genetic and environmental overlap between Chinese and English reading-related skills in Chinese children.中国儿童中英阅读相关技能的遗传与环境重叠
Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2539-48. doi: 10.1037/a0037836. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
9
The genesis of reading ability: what helps children learn letter-sound correspondences?阅读能力的起源:是什么帮助儿童学习字母与发音的对应关系?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Sep;104(1):68-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
10
Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition.遗传和环境对印刷文字识别个体差异的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):97-123. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00181-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?评估研究人员开发的字母知识测量方法的报告质量:其透明度和可重复性如何?
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:601849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601849. eCollection 2021.
2
Multivariate genetic analysis of learning and early reading development.学习与早期阅读发展的多变量遗传分析
Sci Stud Read. 2013 Jan 1;17(3):224-242. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.654298.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Aspects of Literacy and Language in Early Childhood: Continuity and Change from Preschool to Grade 2.遗传与环境对幼儿读写与语言能力各方面的影响:从学前班到二年级的连续性与变化
J Neurolinguistics. 2009 May;22(3):219-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.003.
2
Response to early literacy instruction in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia: A behavioral-genetic analysis.美国、澳大利亚和斯堪的纳维亚地区对早期读写能力教学的反应:一项行为遗传学分析。
Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(3):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.004.
3
Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: two sides of one coin.动态评估与干预反应:硬币的两面。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):111-32. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326207. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
4
Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: an IRT approach.小学低年级语音意识筛查:一种项目反应理论方法
Ann Dyslexia. 2007 Jun;57(1):33-50. doi: 10.1007/s11881-007-0001-2. Epub 2007 May 22.
5
Orthographic learning at a glance: on the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching.一目了然的正字法学习:关于自我教学的时间进程和发展起始
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Apr;87(4):267-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001.
6
Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis.语音编码与正字法学习:自我教学假设的直接检验
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;72(2):95-129. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2481.
7
The diagnosis of twin zygosity.双胎合子性的诊断。
Acta Genet Stat Med. 1966;16(3):265-75. doi: 10.1159/000151973.

学前儿童语音意识的动态与静态评估:一项行为遗传学研究。

Dynamic and static assessment of phonological awareness in preschool: a behavior-genetic study.

机构信息

University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):322-9. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407862. Epub 2011 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/0022219411407862
PMID:21571699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3158276/
Abstract

The genetic and environmental overlap between static and dynamic measures of preschool phonological awareness (PA) and their relation to preschool letter knowledge (LK) and kindergarten reading were examined using monozygotic and dizygotic twin children (maximum N = 1,988). The static tests were those typically used to assess a child's current level of PA such as blending and elision, and the dynamic test included instruction in phoneme identity to assess the child's ability to respond to this instruction. Both forms were influenced by genes and by shared and nonshared environment. The static and dynamic versions were influenced by the same genes, and part of the total genetic influence was shared with LK. They were subject to both overlapping and independent shared environment influences, with the component in common also affecting LK. Nonshared environment influences were mostly independent. Scores from dynamic assessment added only minimally to variance explained in kindergarten reading after LK and static assessment had been factored in. Although one of the genetic factors that influenced both forms of PA also affected kindergarten reading, it was only the one shared with LK. The authors conclude that dynamic assessment of PA in preschool offers little advantage over the more commonly used static forms, especially if LK scores are available, although they acknowledge its potential in cases of preschool educational disadvantage.

摘要

使用同卵和异卵双胞胎儿童(最大 N=1988),研究了学前语音意识(PA)的静态和动态测量之间的遗传和环境重叠及其与学前字母知识(LK)和幼儿园阅读的关系。静态测试是通常用于评估儿童当前 PA 水平的测试,例如混合和省略,动态测试包括语音识别的指导,以评估儿童对该指导的反应能力。这两种形式都受到基因和共同环境以及非共同环境的影响。静态和动态版本受相同基因的影响,部分总遗传影响与 LK 共享。它们受到重叠和独立共享环境影响的共同作用,共同的组成部分也影响 LK。非共享环境影响大多是独立的。在考虑了 LK 和静态评估之后,动态评估对幼儿园阅读的解释方差的增加很小。尽管影响两种 PA 形式的遗传因素之一也影响了幼儿园阅读,但这只是与 LK 共享的因素。作者得出结论,动态评估学前 PA 提供的优势不大,尤其是在有 LK 分数的情况下,尽管他们承认在学前教育劣势的情况下,它具有潜在的优势。