Share David L
Department of Learning Disabilities, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Apr;87(4):267-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001.
Experiment 1 examined the time course of orthographic learning among Grade 3 children. A single encounter with a novel orthographic string was sufficient to produce reliable recall of orthographic detail. Moreover, newly acquired orthographic information was retained 1 month later. These data support the logistic learning functions featured in contemporary connectionist models of reading rather than a "threshold" model of orthographic learning. Experiments 2 and 3 examined self-teaching among novice readers. In contrast to the findings from less regular orthographies such as English and Dutch, beginning readers of a highly regular orthography (Hebrew) appear to be relatively insensitive to word-specific orthographic detail, reading in a nonlexical "surface" fashion. These results suggest fundamental differences between shallow and deep orthographies in the development of orthographic sensitivity.
实验1研究了三年级儿童正字法学习的时间进程。仅一次接触新的正字法字符串就足以可靠地回忆起正字法细节。此外,新获得的正字法信息在1个月后仍能保留。这些数据支持了当代阅读联结主义模型中的逻辑学习功能,而非正字法学习的“阈值”模型。实验2和实验3研究了新手读者的自我教学。与英语和荷兰语等不太规则的正字法的研究结果相反,高度规则正字法(希伯来语)的初学者似乎对特定单词的正字法细节相对不敏感,以非词汇的“表面”方式阅读。这些结果表明,在正字法敏感性发展方面,浅正字法和深正字法之间存在根本差异。