Suppr超能文献

实施州级烟草治疗服务:马萨诸塞州经验教训

Implementing state tobacco treatment services: lessons from the Massachusetts experience.

作者信息

Pbert Lori, Zapka Jane, Jolicoeur Denise G, White Mary Jo, Valentine Goins Karin, Reed George, Ockene Judith K

机构信息

Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2011 Nov;12(6):802-10. doi: 10.1177/1524839910376035. Epub 2011 May 13.

Abstract

This case study was conducted between 2000 and 2003 to examine the implementation of community based tobacco treatment programs funded by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program (MTCP). Four dimensions of implementation, drawn from several models of program evaluation are explored: (a) quantity of services, (b) quality of services, (c) implementation/use of systems, and (d) sustainability. The quantity of services delivered was high, reflecting MTCP's focus on increasing availability of services, particularly in underserved populations. The quality of physician-delivered tobacco intervention did not meet national benchmarks for delivery of all 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange follow-up) and only about half of organizations reported routine systems for auditing tobacco use documentation. Implementation of systems to identify tobacco users and deliver tobacco treatment varied widely by community health settings, with low rates of tobacco use documentation found. Finally, in an era of greater competition for scarce prevention dollars, sustainability of services over time must be planned for from the outset, as indicated by the success of programs that sustained services by proactively and creatively incorporating tobacco treatment into their organizations. This case study can inform states' policies in their design of tobacco treatment services in community health settings.

摘要

本案例研究于2000年至2003年期间开展,旨在考察由马萨诸塞州公共卫生烟草控制项目(MTCP)资助的社区烟草治疗项目的实施情况。从多个项目评估模型中提取了实施的四个维度进行探讨:(a)服务数量,(b)服务质量,(c)系统的实施/使用,以及(d)可持续性。所提供服务的数量很高,这反映了MTCP对增加服务可及性的关注,尤其是在服务不足的人群中。医生提供的烟草干预质量未达到全国所有5A(询问、建议、评估、协助、安排随访)的交付基准,只有约一半的组织报告了审核烟草使用记录的常规系统。识别烟草使用者并提供烟草治疗的系统在不同社区卫生环境中的实施情况差异很大,烟草使用记录率较低。最后,在争夺稀缺预防资金竞争日益激烈的时代,必须从一开始就规划服务随时间推移的可持续性,正如那些通过积极主动且创造性地将烟草治疗纳入其组织而维持服务的项目所取得的成功所表明的那样。本案例研究可为各州在社区卫生环境中设计烟草治疗服务的政策提供参考。

相似文献

7
The first decade of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.马萨诸塞州烟草控制项目的第一个十年。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;120(5):482-95. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000503.

本文引用的文献

3
4
The first decade of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.马萨诸塞州烟草控制项目的第一个十年。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;120(5):482-95. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000503.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验