Cowling David W, Bond Philip
Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services, Sacramento 94234-7320, USA.
Health Econ. 2005 Dec;14(12):1273-81. doi: 10.1002/hec.1016.
California was the first state to implement smoke-free restaurant and bar laws, in 1995 and 1998, respectively. We analyze how these laws affected the distribution of revenues between bars and restaurants. Critics of smoke-free bar laws have often claimed that a prohibition on smoking reduces bar revenues. Similar claims are made for the effects of smoke-free restaurant laws. Such claims implicitly assume that a smoke-free law reduces expenditures by smokers by more than it increases expenditures by non-smokers. Using tax revenue data from 1990 to 2002, our analysis suggests that the actual effect is just the opposite: the 1995 smoke-free restaurant law is associated with an increase in restaurant revenues, while the 1998 smoke-free bar law is associated with an increase in bar revenues.
加利福尼亚分别于1995年和1998年成为首个实施餐厅和酒吧禁烟法的州。我们分析了这些法律如何影响酒吧和餐厅之间的收入分配。无烟酒吧法的批评者常常声称,禁烟会减少酒吧收入。对于无烟餐厅法的影响也有类似说法。此类说法隐含的假设是,无烟法使吸烟者减少的支出超过了非吸烟者增加的支出。利用1990年至2002年的税收数据,我们的分析表明实际效果恰恰相反:1995年的无烟餐厅法使餐厅收入增加,而1998年的无烟酒吧法使酒吧收入增加。