Suppr超能文献

坐姿药球投掷测试老年人上半身力量。

The seated medicine ball throw as a test of upper body power in older adults.

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Exercise Science Laboratory, Western New Mexico University, Silver City, New Mexico, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Aug;25(8):2344-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ecd27b.

Abstract

Practitioners training the older adult may benefit from a low-cost, easy-to-administer field test of upper body power. This study evaluated validity and reliability of the seated medicine ball throw (SMBT) in older adults. Subjects (n = 33; age 72.4 ± 5.2 years) completed 6 trials of an SMBT in each of 2 testing days and 2 ball masses (1.5 and 3.0 kg). Subjects also completed 6 trials of an explosive push-up (EPU) on a force plate over 2 testing days. Validity was assessed via a Pearson Product-Moment correlation (PPM) between SMBT and EPU maximal vertical force. Reliability of the SMBT was determined using PPMs (r), Intraclass correlation (ICC, R) and Bland-Altman plots (BAPs). For validity, the association between the SMBT and the EPU revealed a PPM of r = 0.641 and r = 0.614 for the 1.5- and 3.0-kg medicine balls, respectively. Test-retest reliability of the 1.5- and 3.0-kg SMBT was r = 0.967 and r = 0.958, respectively. The ICC values of the 1.5- and 3.0-kg SMBT were R = 0.994 and 0.989, respectively. The BAPs revealed 94% of the differences between day 1 and 2 scores were within the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference. Test-retest reliability for the EPU was r = 0.944, R = 0.969. The BAPs showed 94% of the differences between day 1 and 2 scores were within the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference, for both medicine ball throws. In conclusion, for the older adult, the SMBT appears to be highly reliable test of upper body power. Its validity relative to the maximal force exerted during the EPU is modest. The SMBT is an inexpensive, safe, and repeatable measure of upper body power for the older adult.

摘要

练习者在训练老年人时,可以受益于一种低成本、易于管理的上半身力量的现场测试。本研究评估了坐姿药球投掷(SMBT)在老年人中的有效性和可靠性。受试者(n=33;年龄 72.4±5.2 岁)在 2 天的测试中,每个测试日完成 6 次 SMBT 试验,使用 2 种球质量(1.5 和 3.0 千克)。受试者还在 2 天的测试中,在力量板上完成了 6 次爆发力俯卧撑(EPU)试验。有效性通过 SMBT 和 EPU 最大垂直力之间的 Pearson 积矩相关系数(PPM)进行评估。SMBT 的可靠性通过 PPM(r)、组内相关系数(ICC,R)和 Bland-Altman 图(BAP)来确定。对于有效性,SMBT 和 EPU 之间的关联显示,对于 1.5-和 3.0-kg 药球,PPM 分别为 r=0.641 和 r=0.614。1.5-和 3.0-kg SMBT 的重测信度分别为 r=0.967 和 r=0.958。1.5-和 3.0-kg SMBT 的 ICC 值分别为 R=0.994 和 0.989。BAP 显示,第一天和第二天得分之间的 94%差异在平均差异的 95%置信区间内。EPU 的重测信度为 r=0.944,R=0.969。BAP 显示,对于两种药球投掷,第一天和第二天得分之间的 94%差异在平均差异的 95%置信区间内。总之,对于老年人来说,SMBT 似乎是一种高度可靠的上半身力量测试。它与 EPU 期间产生的最大力的有效性是适度的。SMBT 是一种经济、安全且可重复的老年人上半身力量测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验