Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Sep;24(9):1191-7. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.81. Epub 2011 May 13.
The incidence of columnar cell lesions in breast core needle biopsies since full-field digital mammography in comparison with screen-filmed mammography was analyzed. As tiny microcalcifications characterize columnar cell lesions at mammography, we hypothesized that more columnar cell lesions are diagnosed since full-field digital mammography due to its higher sensitivity for microcalcifications. In all, 3437 breast core needle biopsies performed in three hospitals and resulting from in total 55 159 mammographies were revised: 1424 taken in the screen-filmed mammography and 2013 in the full-field digital mammography period. Between the screen-filmed mammography and full-field digital mammography periods, we compared the proportion of mammographies that led to core needle biopsies, the mammographic indication for core needle biopsies (density, microcalcifications, or both) and the proportion of columnar cell lesions with or without atypia. The columnar cell lesions were graded according to Schnitt, and we included atypical ductal hyperplasia arising in the context of columnar cell lesions. Proportions were compared using χ(2) tests and prevalence ratios were adjusted for age and hospital. We found that more core needle biopsies per mammogram were taken in the full-field digital mammography period (7.6%) compared with the screen-filmed mammography period (5.0%, P<0.0001). Microcalcifications were more often diagnosed with full-field digital mammography than with screen-filmed mammography (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.14, confidence interval 95%: 1.01-1.28). Core needle biopsies from the full-field digital mammography era showed more columnar cell lesions (10.8%) than those from the screen-filmed mammography era (4.9%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.93, confidence interval 95%: 1.48-2.51), particularly due to more columnar cell lesions without atypia (8.2% respectively 2.8%) while the proportion of columnar cell lesions with atypia remained nearly constant (2.0 vs 2.6%). In conclusion, since the implementation of full-field digital mammography, more microcalcifications are seen at mammography, more often resulting in core needle biopsies, which especially yields more columnar cell lesions without atypia.
本文分析了全数字化乳腺摄影与常规屏片乳腺摄影相比,在乳腺芯针活检中柱状细胞病变的发生率。由于在乳腺摄影中柱状细胞病变的特征是微小钙化,我们假设由于全数字化乳腺摄影对微钙化的敏感性更高,因此诊断出更多的柱状细胞病变。共对三所医院的 3437 例乳腺芯针活检进行了复查,这些活检源自总共 55159 例乳腺摄影:1424 例来自常规屏片乳腺摄影,2013 例来自全数字化乳腺摄影。在常规屏片乳腺摄影和全数字化乳腺摄影期间,我们比较了导致芯针活检的乳腺摄影比例、芯针活检的乳腺摄影指征(密度、微钙化或两者兼有)以及伴有或不伴有非典型性的柱状细胞病变的比例。根据 Schnitt 对柱状细胞病变进行分级,并包括柱状细胞病变背景下发生的非典型导管增生。使用 χ(2)检验比较比例,并用年龄和医院进行调整后计算患病率比。我们发现,全数字化乳腺摄影期间每例乳腺摄影的芯针活检例数更多(7.6%比常规屏片乳腺摄影的 5.0%,P<0.0001)。与常规屏片乳腺摄影相比,全数字化乳腺摄影更常诊断出微钙化(调整后的患病率比:1.14,95%置信区间:1.01-1.28)。全数字化乳腺摄影时代的芯针活检显示更多的柱状细胞病变(10.8%)比常规屏片乳腺摄影时代的(4.9%)多(调整后的患病率比:1.93,95%置信区间:1.48-2.51),这主要是因为不伴非典型性的柱状细胞病变更多(8.2%比 2.8%),而伴非典型性的柱状细胞病变比例基本保持不变(2.0%比 2.6%)。总之,自全数字化乳腺摄影实施以来,乳腺摄影中更多地发现微钙化,更多地导致芯针活检,这尤其导致更多不伴非典型性的柱状细胞病变。