Fuller Brian M, Gajera Mithil, Schorr Christa, Gerber David, Dellinger R Phillip, Parrillo Joseph, Zanotti Sergio
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;14(4):165-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.76078.
The optimal hemoglobin level and transfusion threshold in patients with septic shock treated with an early, goal oriented approach to resuscitation remains unknown.
To assess the impact of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with septic shock treated with early goal directed therapy (EGDT).
Retrospective cohort study of 93 patients who presented with septic shock, to a single center academic intensive care unit and received EGDT.
Data were collected on patients identified via the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Chart Review database and linked to Project IMPACT database. The PRBC group and no PRBC group were compared by the Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact test to analyze statistical significance.
The PRBC group had a mortality of 41.2% vs. 33.9% in the no PRBC transfusion group (P = NS). The PRBC group also had more mechanical ventilation days (11.2 days vs. 5.0 days, (P ≤ 0.05), longer hospital length of stay (25.9 days vs. 12.5 days, (P ≤ 0.05), and longer intensive care unit length of stay (11.4 days vs. 3.8 days, (P ≤ 0.05).
In this retrospective cohort study, transfusion of PRBCs was associated with worsened clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock treated with EGDT. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of transfusion of PRBC within the context of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock, as the beneficial effects gained by an early and goal oriented approach to resuscitation may be lost by the negative effects associated with PRBC transfusion.
对于采用早期目标导向复苏方法治疗的感染性休克患者,最佳血红蛋白水平和输血阈值仍不清楚。
评估红细胞悬液(PRBC)输注对采用早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)的感染性休克患者临床相关结局的影响。
对93例出现感染性休克并入住单一中心学术重症监护病房且接受EGDT治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究。
通过“拯救脓毒症运动图表回顾”数据库识别患者并收集数据,这些数据与“影响项目”数据库相关联。采用Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较PRBC组和非PRBC组,以分析统计学意义。
PRBC组死亡率为41.2%,而非PRBC输血组为33.9%(P =无统计学意义)。PRBC组机械通气天数更多(11.2天对5.0天,P≤0.05),住院时间更长(25.9天对12.5天,P≤0.05),重症监护病房住院时间更长(11.4天对3.8天,P≤0.05)。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,对于采用EGDT治疗的感染性休克患者,输注PRBC与更差的临床结局相关。需要进一步研究以确定在感染性休克患者早期复苏背景下输注PRBC的影响,因为早期目标导向复苏方法所获得的有益效果可能会被PRBC输注相关的负面影响抵消。