Quinn Paul C, Anzures Gizelle, Izard Carroll E, Lee Kang, Pascalis Olivier, Slater Alan M, Tanaka James W
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, USA.
Emot Rev. 2011 Apr 6;3(2):197-206. doi: 10.1177/1754073910387941.
A comparison of the literatures on how infants represent generic object classes, gender and race information in faces, and emotional expressions reveals both common and distinctive developments in the three domains. In addition, the review indicates that some very basic questions remain to be answered regarding how infants represent facial displays of emotion, including (a) whether infants form category representations for discrete classes of emotion, when and how such representations come(b) to incorporate affective meaning, (c) the developmental trajectory for representation of emotional expression at different levels of inclusiveness (i.e., from broad to narrow or narrow to broad?), and (d) whether there is superior discrimination ability operating within more frequently experienced emotion categories.
关于婴儿如何表征一般物体类别、面部中的性别和种族信息以及情感表达的文献比较揭示了这三个领域中既有共同的发展也有独特的发展。此外,该综述表明,关于婴儿如何表征面部情感展示仍有一些非常基本的问题有待回答,包括:(a)婴儿是否为离散的情感类别形成类别表征,以及此类表征何时以及如何(b)纳入情感意义,(c)在不同包容度水平上(即从宽泛到狭窄还是从狭窄到宽泛?)情感表达表征的发展轨迹,以及(d)在更常经历的情感类别中是否存在更强的辨别能力。