• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即将出现在您身边的医生面前:医学新自由主义与制药临床试验。

Coming Soon to a Physician Near You: Medical Neoliberalism and Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Fisher Jill A

出版信息

Harvard Health Policy Rev. 2007 Spring;8(1):61-70.

PMID:21572938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3092550/
Abstract

This paper aims to expand standard conceptions of current ethical issues by discussing pharmaceutical clinical trials in terms of the broader political economy. Specifically, it explores one important characteristic of the political economy in the United States: the trend towards the neoliberalization of health care. First, it provides an overview of neoliberalism and its manifestations in the health care sector. Then, it applies this perspective to pharmaceutical drug development. The paper argues that federal regulation must attend to the context of clinical research to protect human subjects more fully.

摘要

本文旨在通过从更广泛的政治经济角度讨论药物临床试验,来拓展对当前伦理问题的标准概念。具体而言,它探讨了美国政治经济的一个重要特征:医疗保健领域的新自由主义化趋势。首先,它概述了新自由主义及其在医疗保健部门的表现。然后,将这一视角应用于药物研发。本文认为,联邦监管必须关注临床研究的背景,以更充分地保护人类受试者。

相似文献

1
Coming Soon to a Physician Near You: Medical Neoliberalism and Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.即将出现在您身边的医生面前:医学新自由主义与制药临床试验。
Harvard Health Policy Rev. 2007 Spring;8(1):61-70.
2
'Good morning Metro shoppers!' Food insecurity, COVID-19 and the emergence of roll-call neoliberalism.“早上好,地铁购物者们!”粮食不安全、新冠疫情与点名式新自由主义的出现。
Cap Class. 2024 Dec;48(4):635-656. doi: 10.1177/03098168231199912. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3
Practicing research ethics: private-sector physicians & pharmaceutical clinical trials.践行研究伦理:私营部门医生与药物临床试验
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
4
Towards Critical Analysis of the Political Determinants of Health Comment on "How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention".对“新自由主义如何塑造不健康商品的供应以及这对非传染性疾病预防意味着什么”一文的政治决定因素的批判性分析
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Mar 1;9(3):121-123. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.102.
5
Current issues surrounding women and minorities in drug trials.药物试验中围绕女性和少数群体的当前问题。
Ann Pharmacother. 1993 Jul-Aug;27(7-8):904-11. doi: 10.1177/106002809302700719.
6
Pilot Medical Certification飞行员医学认证
7
Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities.全球化和新自由主义是健康不平等的结构性驱动因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 9;16(Suppl 1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0365-2.
8
9
Governing the resilience of neoliberalism through biopolitics.通过生命政治来管控新自由主义的韧性。
Eur J Int Relat. 2017 Sep;23(3):489-512. doi: 10.1177/1354066116676321. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequity in clinical research access for service users presenting comorbidity within alcohol treatment settings: findings from a focused ethnographic study.在酒精治疗环境中,患有合并症的服务使用者在临床研究中的参与机会存在不平等现象:一项聚焦民族志研究的发现。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 22;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02197-1.
2
Towards cultural materialism in the medical humanities: the case of blood rejuvenation.迈向医学人文学科中的文化唯物主义:血液回春术案例
Med Humanit. 2018 Mar;44(1):5-14. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011209. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
Teaching Conflict: Professionalism and Medical Education.教学冲突:职业素养与医学教育
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Dec;12(4):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9648-2. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
Institutional mistrust in the organization of pharmaceutical clinical trials.医疗机构对药物临床试验组织的不信任。
Med Health Care Philos. 2008 Dec;11(4):403-13. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9154-y. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
"Ready-to-Recruit" or "Ready-to-Consent" Populations?: Informed Consent and the Limits of Subject Autonomy.“随时可招募”还是“随时可同意”人群?:知情同意与受试者自主性的限度
Qual Inq. 2007 Sep;13(6):875-894. doi: 10.1177/1077800407304460.
2
Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry.程序误解与知情同意:来自临床试验行业实证研究的见解
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Sep;16(3):251-68. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0018.
3
Brief report: if you build it, they will come: methods for recruiting Latinos into cancer research.简短报告:如果你建造了它,他们就会来:招募拉丁裔参与癌症研究的方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 May;20(5):444-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0083.x.
4
The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.实证研究在知情同意理论与实践研究中的前景。
HEC Forum. 2004 Mar;16(1):53-71. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000031780.66472.f4.
5
Emily's scars. Surgical shapings, technoluxe, and bioethics.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):18-29.
6
Enrolling the uninsured in clinical trials: an ethical perspective.让未参保者参与临床试验:伦理视角
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S121-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054907.33928.48.
7
Clinical trial enrollers vs. nonenrollers: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) project.临床试验入组者与未入组者:心律失常抑制试验(CAST)临床试验招募与入组评估(REACT)项目
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):46-59. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00089-5.
8
Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.将少数族裔纳入临床试验:迈向对参与者友好的体系。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Dec 6;87(23):1747-59. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747.