Suppr超能文献

接受麻醉下眼科检查的儿童不使用静脉输液管能安全麻醉吗?

Can children undergoing ophthalmologic examinations under anesthesia be safely anesthetized without using an IV line?

作者信息

Vigoda Michael M, Latiff Azeema, Murray Timothy G, Tutiven Jacqueline L, Berrocal Audina M, Gayer Steven

机构信息

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:503-8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S18605. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To document that with proper patient and procedure selection, children undergoing general inhalational anesthesia for ophthalmologic exams (with or without photos, ultrasound, laser treatment, peri-ocular injection of chemotherapy, suture removal, and/or replacement of ocular prosthesis) can be safely anesthetized without the use of an intravenous (IV) line. Children are rarely anesthetized without IV access placement. We performed a retrospective study to determine our incidence of IV access placement during examinations under anesthesia (EUA) and the incidence of adverse events that required intraoperative IV access placement.

METHODS

Data collected from our operating room (OR) information system includes but is not limited to diagnosis, anesthesiologist, surgeon, and location of IV catheter (if applicable), patient's date of birth, actual procedure, and anesthesia/procedure times. We reviewed the OR and anesthetic records of children (>1 month and <10 years) who underwent EUAs between January 1, 2003 and May 31, 2009. We determined the percentage of children who were anesthetized without IV access placement, as well as the incidence of any adverse events that required IV access placement, intraoperatively.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 3196 procedures performed during a 77-month period. Patients' ages ranged from 1 month to 9 years. Overall, 92% of procedures were performed without IV access placement. Procedure duration ranged from 1-39 minutes. Reasons for IV access placement included parental preference for antinausea medication and/or attending preference for IV access placement. No child who underwent anesthesia without an IV line had an intraoperative adverse event requiring insertion of an IV line.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that for children undergoing general anesthesia for ophthalmologic exams (with or without photos, ultrasound, laser treatment, intraocular injection of chemotherapy, suture removal, and/or replacement of ocular prosthesis), anesthesia can be safely conducted without placement of an IV line.

摘要

目的

证明通过适当的患者和手术选择,接受眼科检查全身吸入麻醉(有或无拍照、超声、激光治疗、眼周化疗注射、缝线拆除和/或眼假体置换)的儿童在不使用静脉(IV)通路的情况下也能安全麻醉。儿童很少在未放置静脉通路的情况下接受麻醉。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定我们在麻醉下检查(EUA)期间静脉通路放置的发生率以及需要术中放置静脉通路的不良事件发生率。

方法

从我们的手术室(OR)信息系统收集的数据包括但不限于诊断、麻醉医生、外科医生和静脉导管位置(如适用)、患者出生日期、实际手术以及麻醉/手术时间。我们回顾了2003年1月1日至2009年5月31日期间接受EUA的1个月以上且10岁以下儿童的手术室和麻醉记录。我们确定了未放置静脉通路而接受麻醉的儿童百分比以及术中需要放置静脉通路的任何不良事件发生率。

结果

我们分析了77个月期间进行的3196例手术的数据。患者年龄从1个月到9岁不等。总体而言,92%的手术未放置静脉通路。手术持续时间从1到39分钟不等。放置静脉通路的原因包括家长对抗呕吐药物的偏好和/或主治医生对放置静脉通路的偏好。没有接受无静脉通路麻醉的儿童发生需要插入静脉通路的术中不良事件。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于接受眼科检查全身麻醉(有或无拍照、超声、激光治疗、眼内化疗注射、缝线拆除和/或眼假体置换)的儿童,不放置静脉通路也能安全进行麻醉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de61/3090306/05de1803107f/opth-5-503f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验