Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Aug;84(6):675-82. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0644-5. Epub 2011 May 15.
To describe and demonstrate issues with return to work (RTW) outcome metrics in common use among clinical researchers and injury compensation organisations. We also aim to describe a framework on which to capture relevant RTW information including current employment status and data on participation and maintenance.
Structured telephone interviews discussing participant health and vocational status were conducted following compensable transport-related injury. Participants who were working at the time of injury and took time off work because of their injuries (N = 414) were asked questions relating to their work participation and maintenance, including length of continuous employment, hours worked and duties performed before and after injury. A series of RTW metrics was developed and applied to survey data. Rates of RTW according to each metric were calculated.
Eighty-four per cent of participants had achieved some employment since their injury, and 74% were working at the time of the survey. In contrast, only 58% of participants were working the same hours as prior to their injury and had been doing so for at least 3 months. These data show that different impressions of rehabilitative success can be obtained depending on the criterion used to define RTW suggesting that reliance on a single RTW index (e.g. 'are you currently working?') will not represent important characteristics of employment.
A multi-layered approach to measuring RTW that includes data on reasons for not working, length of continuous employment, hours and duties performed after injury provides greater insight into the vocational status of injured individuals compared to single metrics or outcomes that fail to capture key detail on motives and participation. This information can assist clinicians to more accurately monitor the progress of rehabilitation following injury and compensation schemes to more effectively monitor their performance.
描述和展示在临床研究人员和伤害赔偿组织中常用的重返工作(RTW)结果指标中存在的问题。我们还旨在描述一个框架,以捕捉相关的 RTW 信息,包括当前的就业状况以及参与和维持的数据。
在发生可赔偿的交通相关伤害后,对参与者的健康和职业状况进行了结构化的电话访谈。在受伤时正在工作并因受伤而休假的参与者(N=414)被问及与工作参与和维持有关的问题,包括连续就业的时间长度、受伤前后的工作时间和职责。制定了一系列 RTW 指标并应用于调查数据。根据每个指标计算 RTW 的比率。
84%的参与者在受伤后已经有了某种工作,74%的人在调查时正在工作。相比之下,只有 58%的参与者的工作时间与受伤前相同,并且已经至少工作了 3 个月。这些数据表明,根据定义 RTW 的标准,可能会对康复成功的印象产生不同的影响,这表明仅依赖单一的 RTW 指标(例如“你现在是否正在工作?”)将无法代表就业的重要特征。
一种衡量 RTW 的多层次方法,包括未工作的原因、连续就业的时间长度、受伤后工作时间和职责的信息,与未能捕捉动机和参与的关键细节的单一指标或结果相比,能更深入地了解受伤个体的职业状况。这些信息可以帮助临床医生更准确地监测受伤后的康复进展,帮助赔偿计划更有效地监测其绩效。