• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保胆切除术对可切除胃癌患者生存获益的影响:一项随机对照试验的中期分析结果。

Survival benefit of bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: interim analysis results of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0058-9. Epub 2011 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-011-0058-9
PMID:21573917
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bursectomy is regarded as a standard surgical procedure during gastrectomy for serosa-positive gastric cancer in Japan. There is little evidence, however, that bursectomy has clinical benefit. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to demonstrate non-inferiority of treatment with the omission of bursectomy.

METHODS

Between July 2002 and January 2007, 210 patients with cT2-T3 gastric adenocarcinoma were intraoperatively randomized to radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy with or without bursectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, operative morbidity, and levels of amylase in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1. Two interim analyses were performed, in September 2008 and August 2010.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity (14.3%) and mortality (0.95%) rates were the same in the two groups. The median levels of amylase in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 were similar in the two groups (P = 0.543). In the second interim analysis, the 3-year OS rates were 85.6% in the bursectomy group and 79.6% in the non-bursectomy group. The hazard ratio for death without bursectomy was 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.61; P = 0.443 for non-inferiority). Among 48 serosa-positive (pT3-T4) patients, the 3-year OS was 69.8% for the bursectomy group and 50.2% for the non-bursectomy group, conferring a hazard ratio for death of 2.16 (95% CI 0.89-5.22; P = 0.791 for non-inferiority). More patients in the non-bursectomy group had peritoneal recurrences than in the bursectomy group (13.2 vs. 8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The interim analyses suggest that bursectomy may improve survival and should not be abandoned as a futile procedure until more definitive data can be obtained.

摘要

背景

在日本,对于浆膜阳性的胃癌患者,行胃切除术时进行囊切除术被认为是一种标准的手术程序。然而,几乎没有证据表明囊切除术具有临床益处。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以证明在不切除囊的情况下进行治疗不劣于前者。

方法

2002 年 7 月至 2007 年 1 月,210 名 cT2-T3 胃腺癌患者在术中被随机分为根治性胃切除术和 D2 淋巴结清扫术,加或不加囊切除术。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点是无复发生存期、手术发病率和术后第 1 天引流液中淀粉酶的水平。在 2008 年 9 月和 2010 年 8 月进行了两次中期分析。

结果

两组的总发病率(14.3%)和死亡率(0.95%)相同。两组术后第 1 天引流液中淀粉酶的中位数水平相似(P=0.543)。在第二次中期分析中,囊切除术组的 3 年 OS 率为 85.6%,非囊切除术组为 79.6%。无囊切除术死亡的风险比为 1.44(95%置信区间[CI]0.79-2.61;P=0.443 用于非劣效性)。在 48 例浆膜阳性(pT3-T4)患者中,囊切除术组的 3 年 OS 率为 69.8%,非囊切除术组为 50.2%,死亡风险比为 2.16(95%CI0.89-5.22;P=0.791 用于非劣效性)。非囊切除术组比囊切除术组有更多的腹膜复发(13.2 例 vs. 8.7 例)。

结论

中期分析表明,囊切除术可能提高生存率,在获得更明确的数据之前,不应将其视为无效程序而放弃。

相似文献

1
Survival benefit of bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: interim analysis results of a randomized controlled trial.保胆切除术对可切除胃癌患者生存获益的影响:一项随机对照试验的中期分析结果。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0058-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
2
Bursectomy versus omentectomy alone for resectable gastric cancer (JCOG1001): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.单纯脾切除术与单纯网膜切除术治疗可切除性胃癌(JCOG1001):一项 III 期、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;3(7):460-468. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30090-6. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
3
Long-term outcomes after prophylactic bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: Final analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.可切除胃癌患者预防性切除滑囊后的长期结局:一项多中心随机对照试验的最终分析
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.024. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
4
Influence of bursectomy on operative morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.去盲囊术对胃癌根治术后手术发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0914-5.
5
Is bursectomy necessary for patients with gastric cancer invading the serosa?对于胃癌侵犯浆膜层的患者,是否有必要进行淋巴结清扫术?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Sep-Oct;51(59):1524-6.
6
Role of bursectomy for advanced gastric cancer: result of a case-control study from a large volume hospital.根治性全胃切除联合脾脏切除在进展期胃癌治疗中的作用:来自一家大型医院的病例对照研究结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;39(12):1407-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
7
Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision, D2 + CME) with conventional D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(D2淋巴结清扫术加完整胃系膜切除术,D2+CME)与传统D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃腺癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 9;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2790-5.
8
Bursectomy and non-bursectomy D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer, initial experience from a single institution in China.晚期胃癌的切除与非切除D2胃切除术:来自中国一家机构的初步经验
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec 8;13:332. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0744-x.
9
Efficiency of bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.保胆切除术治疗可切除胃癌的疗效:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1483-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
10
Totally laparoscopic complete bursectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy in radical total gastrectomy: an outside bursa omentalis approach.全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术中完全网膜囊切除术及D2淋巴结清扫术:一种网膜囊外入路
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4702-z. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Partial Omentectomy in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for pT3-T4a Stage Gastric Cancer.腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗pT3-T4a期胃癌时行部分网膜切除术的安全性和有效性
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Oct 17;16:4681-4690. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S434090. eCollection 2023.
2
A retrospective study comparing D1 limited lymph node dissection and D2 extended lymph node dissection for N3 gastric cancer.一项比较D1局限性淋巴结清扫术与D2扩大淋巴结清扫术治疗N3期胃癌的回顾性研究。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):2259-2266. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.42.
3
Lack of Oncological Benefit from Bursectomy in Radical Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of bursectomy on operative morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.去盲囊术对胃癌根治术后手术发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0914-5.
2
ON THE RADICAL OPERATION FOR CANCER OF THE PYLORUS: WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ADVANTAGES OF THE TWO-STAGE OPERATION AND TO THE QUESTION OF THE REMOVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED LYMPHATICS.论幽门癌的根治性手术:特别提及两阶段手术的优势及相关淋巴结清扫问题。
Br Med J. 1910 Feb 12;1(2563):366-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.2563.366.
3
根治性胃切除术中切除囊袋无肿瘤学获益:一项系统评价
Visc Med. 2021 Dec;37(6):511-520. doi: 10.1159/000517654. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Risk Assessment and Preventive Treatment for Peritoneal Recurrence Following Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer.胃癌根治性切除术后腹膜复发的风险评估与预防性治疗
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 3;11:778152. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.778152. eCollection 2021.
5
Efficacy of Omentum-Preserving Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.保留大网膜胃癌切除术治疗胃癌患者的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 3;11:710814. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.710814. eCollection 2021.
6
The benefits of surgery plus extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for patients with gastric cancer compared with surgery alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术联合广泛术中腹腔灌洗(EIPL)与单纯手术治疗胃癌患者的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01120-5. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
The role of bursectomy in the surgical management of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.胆囊切除术在胃癌外科治疗中的作用:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):939-950. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00801-x. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Surgery for Gastric Remnant Cancer Results in Similar Overall Survival Rates Compared with Primary Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.胃残胃癌的手术治疗与原发性胃癌的总体生存率相当:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4196-4203. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08669-2. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Gastric cancer surgery: historical background and perspective in Western countries versus Japan.胃癌手术:西方国家与日本的历史背景及展望
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(18):493. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.48.
10
Recent Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Review.近期进展:胃癌的外科治疗进展:综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 May 13;25:3537-3541. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916475.
Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine.
使用口服氟嘧啶S-1对胃癌进行辅助化疗。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1810-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072252.
4
Distribution of free cancer cells in the abdominal cavity suggests limitations of bursectomy as an essential component of radical surgery for gastric carcinoma.腹腔内游离癌细胞的分布提示,作为胃癌根治性手术重要组成部分的淋巴结清扫存在局限性。
Gastric Cancer. 2007;10(1):24-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-006-0404-5. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
5
Preliminary data release for randomized clinical trials of noninferiority: a new proposal.非劣效性随机临床试验的初步数据发布:一项新提议。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5831-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.105. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
6
Is bursectomy necessary for patients with gastric cancer invading the serosa?对于胃癌侵犯浆膜层的患者,是否有必要进行淋巴结清扫术?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Sep-Oct;51(59):1524-6.
7
Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition -.日本胃癌分类 - 第二英文版 -
Gastric Cancer. 1998 Dec;1(1):10-24. doi: 10.1007/s101209800016.
8
Complete omentectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy with gastrectomy improves the survival of gastric cancer patients with metastases in the adjacent peritoneum.全网膜切除术及广泛淋巴结清扫联合胃切除术可提高伴有相邻腹膜转移的胃癌患者的生存率。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Sep-Oct;45(23):1922-9.
9
Milky spots as the implantation site for malignant cells in peritoneal dissemination in mice.乳斑作为小鼠腹膜播散中恶性细胞的种植部位。
Cancer Res. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):687-92.
10
Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality.日本胃癌手术的进展及其根治性的局限性。
World J Surg. 1987 Aug;11(4):418-25. doi: 10.1007/BF01655804.