Suppr超能文献

[利用孕妇体重测量值进行超声估计巨大胎儿体重的公式]

[Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].

作者信息

Murlewska Julia, Pietryga Marek, Wender-Ozegowska Ewa

机构信息

Klinik Poloznictwa i Chorób Kobiecych UM, Poznaniu, Polska.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2011 Feb;82(2):114-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Methods of macrosomic fetal weight estimation are associated with large deviations and statistically significant errors. Fetal macrosomia might be better predicted by using fetal ultrasound measurements and maternal characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ultrasound evaluation of fetal weight was performed in 113 singleton fetuses one week (max. 7 days) before delivery. Retrospectively all newborns with birth weight o A new logarithmic estimation formula proposed by Hart and co. was compared with commonly used formulas of Shepard, Campbell, Hadlock I, Hadlock II, Hadlock Ill. Exclusion criteria were: multiple pregnancies, intrauterine deaths, structural or chromosomal abnormalities. The new formula established by Hart (loge EFW = 7.6377445039 + 0.0002951035 x maternal weight + 0.0003949464 x HC + 0.0005241529 x AC + 0,0048698624 x FL) uses fetal biometric measurements and maternal weight as two different parameters: EFW- estimated fetal weight, maternal weight--weight measured at one week (max. 7 days) before delivery HC--fetal head circumference, AC--abdominal circumference, FL--femur length.

RESULTS

The new Hart formula gives the lowest mean percentage error (MPE) : -0.74% and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) : 3.38%, as compared to other routinely used formulas which presented statistically significantly higher MPE and AMPE With the new formula 84 of estimated fetal weights fell within +5% of the actual weight at birth, 111 within +/- 10% and 112 within +/- 15% and +/- 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented ultrasound formula demonstrated a more precise macrosomic fetuses weight estimation with the lowest MPE and MAPE as compared to the others and might be introduced when fetal macrosomia is suspected.

摘要

引言

巨大胎儿体重估计方法存在较大偏差和统计学上的显著误差。使用胎儿超声测量和母亲特征可能能更好地预测胎儿巨大。

材料与方法

在分娩前一周(最多7天)对113名单胎胎儿进行了胎儿体重的超声评估。回顾性地将所有出生体重……的新生儿与哈特等人提出的新对数估计公式与常用的谢泼德公式、坎贝尔公式、哈德洛克I公式、哈德洛克II公式、哈德洛克III公式进行比较。排除标准为:多胎妊娠、宫内死亡、结构或染色体异常。哈特建立的新公式(自然对数的估计胎儿体重=7.6377445039+0.0002951035×母亲体重+0.0003949464×头围+0.0005241529×腹围+0.0048698624×股骨长度)使用胎儿生物测量值和母亲体重作为两个不同参数:估计胎儿体重(EFW)、母亲体重(分娩前一周(最多7天)测量的体重)、头围(HC)、腹围(AC)、股骨长度(FL)。

结果

与其他常规使用的公式相比,新的哈特公式的平均百分比误差(MPE)最低:-0.74%,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为3.38%,其他公式的MPE和AMPE在统计学上显著更高。使用新公式时,84例估计胎儿体重落在出生实际体重的±5%范围内,111例落在±10%范围内,112例落在±15%和±20%范围内。

结论

与其他公式相比,所提出的超声公式在估计巨大胎儿体重方面表现出更高的精确性,MPE和MAPE最低,当怀疑胎儿巨大时可采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验