Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):123-34. doi: 10.1037/a0023918. Epub 2011 May 16.
Although dual-task interference is ubiquitous in a variety of task domains, stop-signal studies suggest that response inhibition is not subject to such interference. Nevertheless, no study has directly examined stop-signal performance in a dual-task setting. In two experiments, stop-signal performance was examined in a psychological refractory period task, in which subjects inhibited one response while still executing the other. The results showed little evidence for the refractory effect in stop-signal reaction time, and stop-signal reaction time was similar in dual-task and single-task conditions, despite the fact that overt reaction times were significantly affected by dual-task interference. Therefore, the present study supports the claim that response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
尽管双重任务干扰在各种任务领域中普遍存在,但停止信号研究表明,反应抑制不受这种干扰的影响。然而,没有研究直接在双重任务环境中检查停止信号性能。在两项实验中,在心理不应期任务中检查了停止信号性能,在该任务中,受试者在执行另一个反应的同时抑制一个反应。结果表明,停止信号反应时间中几乎没有证据表明存在不应期效应,并且停止信号反应时间在双重任务和单任务条件下相似,尽管明显的反应时间受到双重任务干扰的显著影响。因此,本研究支持反应抑制不受双重任务干扰的说法。